gnodet wrote: > > On 12/14/06, RNobrega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> Both ideas are great, but lack the "future-proof" feature we would >> like to have; btw, we also thought of jmx, exposing methods to change >> the parameters, but this would also be an "a priori" effort >> > > What if all servicemix components that use the xbean deployer were > able to load additional spring configuration files ? Such a file could > contain the definition of a BeanFactoryPostProcessor , which would be > automatically applied to all deployed xbean.xml files. > Such a configuration could be done in the components.properties file > which is currently by components to retrieve default configuration values. > Imho, this would be generic enough to be reused in other cases ... > This would also ensure that all properties can be modified but I think it > would > be easier to use than using reflection. Thoughts ? > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > Yes, looks very promising, but I'm not sure I can guess all the ramifications right now... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/listeners-in-container-and-MessageExchange-tf2815007s12049.html#a7873201 Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
