stephan.lux wrote: > > Sure, the performance is suffering if you do a lot of xml conversions, but > in this cas I only use a small 300 byte xml file and the xslt > transformation only copies the content into a new cover. > > The blocking ressource is the system memory, 512 MB is not enough on > windows. Has anyone run some loadtests on unix/linux with more than 5000 > jobs? How many memory was used? > > Cheers > Stephan > > > gnodet wrote: >> >> ServiceMix performance mainly depends on the processing performed, >> either directly or indirectly (scripting may be slower than java, lots >> of xml conversions ...). >> Make sure the log level is set to INFO or more. >> And also make sure your CPU is used at 100%, else it means >> there is a blocking resource (number of threads, IO ...) >> >> On 12/29/06, stephan.lux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> stephan.lux wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi Guillaume, >>> > >>> > I have now all of your tipps applied and rerun the test with 5.000 >>> jobs. >>> > It failes again this out of memory messages and the processing stops. >>> So I >>> > have seperated the service assemblies on two boxes with each 512MB of >>> RAM >>> > for Service Mix. On one maschine once again out of memory messages are >>> > thrown, but the most of the jobs could be processed. So it seams, that >>> the >>> > script component needs a lot of memory... >>> > >>> > But for the processing servicemix needs round about 8 hours! That is >>> not >>> > realy acceptable for us, so do you have any more tuning tipps for me? >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/Severe-issues-while-load-testing-tf2845236s12049.html#a8088779 >>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> >> >
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Severe-issues-while-load-testing-tf2845236s12049.html#a8122637 Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
