Thx guys this is what I thought and wanted some confirmation before I proceded to apply the changes. The strangest part of this all is that this used to work with servicemix 3.0.
ANyway I will try that and let you guys know. ... Eric ----- Original Message ---- From: Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 1:31:54 PM Subject: Re: Need help . On 1/19/07, Eric Dofonsou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > SynchronizationProvider.process() > ------------ > public void process(MessageExchange exchange) throws Exception > { > //exchange.setService(endpoint.getDestinationService()); > channel.send(exchange); > } I believe the issue is that, like Adrian noted, you cannot just send along an exchange. The reason that the strange error is being thrown is because the SynchronizationProvider is a consumer and so the exchange passed to its process method is already active and must therefore must be set to DONE. In addition, you must copy the in message to the out message. Below is an example of all of this: NormalizedMessage in = exchange.getMessage("in"); NormalizedMessage out = exchange.createMessage(); out.setContent(in.getContent()); exchange.setMessage(out, "out"); exchange.setStatus(ExchangeStatus.DONE); channel.send(exchange); Bruce -- perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" );' Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/ Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/ Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/ Castor - http://castor.org/ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Need Mail bonding? Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091
