Hi Guillaume,

Thanks ! I had'nt seen that sample. Also, I just wanted to confirm if the
static recepient list pattern would be suitable in the following scenario:
1. request over http (in/out)
2. do some operations .. file, db etc.
3.  Now we want to do a parallel activity (similar to a bpel "flow"
activity). One action should be to respond to the http request and the
second to write to a jms queue.

Is the above pattern the best way to accomplish step (3).

Regards,
vedder


gnodet wrote:
> 
> Take a look at the bridge tutorial and example.
> http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/creating-a-protocol-bridge.html
> 
> On 2/8/07, Vedder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've worked with a couple of commercial ESB's and was trying to use
>> ServiceMix. I guess the docs are still work in progress. I was trying out
>> a
>> simple scenario. Accept an Http post request -> write the same to JMS. So
>> based on what I could understand, I created 2 su's - one for the JMS
>> component and the other for HTTP. These only contain xbean.xml's in them
>> which have binding information. I budeled this into an sa and tried to
>> deploy, but am getting various issues.
>>
>> I've attached the sa that I'm trying to deploy. Any pointers as to what
>> I'm
>> doing wrong would be great ! http://www.nabble.com/file/6315/multi-sa.zip
>> multi-sa.zip
>> rgds,
>> Vedder
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Http-Post--%3E-JMS-Queue-tf3194769s12049.html#a8870318
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Http-Post--%3E-JMS-Queue-tf3194769s12049.html#a8921970
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to