Forgot to say that the current exchange has to be given as param.

Cheers,
Thomas


Thomas TERMIN wrote:
> Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> However, it might be possible to enhance the ComponentSupport
>> or another class to support the correlation id automatically.
>> This would make all lightweight components to support that.
> We could extend ComponentSupport with methods to create the new
> exchanges and this methods could put the correlation id automatically in
> the new excahnge. So if you would use ComponentSupport to create the
> exchange the correlationId will be propagated. The advantage is that you
> don't have to use this functions and it would be backward compatible.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> 
>> On 1/23/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I don't think so, as the container (or the ecxhange factory) has no way
>>> to know which jbi exchange is currently handled by the component.
>>> And you can not use a thread local, has the component may delegate
>>> the exhcange processing to another thread.
>>> That's the reason why it has been implemented in servicemix-common.
>>> Do you see something else ?
>>>
>>> On 1/23/07, Thomas TERMIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> A question again. If I have a lw component which opens a new message
>>>> exchange the correlation id has to be propageted in the component
>>>> itself. Would it be better or is it possible to do this automaticaly in
>>>> the exchange factory?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Thomas
>>>>
>>>> Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>> The way it works now is that
>>>>> all components using servicemix-common that create an exchange
>>>>> as part of the processing of a received exchange, will automatically
>>>>> put the correlationId in the new exchange properties.
>>>>> The correlationId is equal to correlationId of the input exchange,
>>> or the
>>>>> input exchange id if no correlation id is set.
>>>>>
>>>>> So if an endpoint A sends a JBI exchange to enpoint B, and endpoint B
>>>>> sends a jbi exchange to endpoint C while processing the exchange,
>>>>> both exchange will have the same correlationId.
>>>>>
>>>>> If we write a MessageExchange event listener, we should be able to
>>>>> retrieve all these informations.  Note that the flow can be retrieved
>>>>> with the same logic used in the DotViewFlowListener instead.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just copy the DotViewFlowListener and change the drawing
>>>>> logic.  What tool are will you use to draw the flow ?  The output
>>>>> of the DotViewFlowListener is not very impressive, so any
>>>>> improvement would be welcome.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/10/07, Thomas TERMIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> How is this intended to work? I want to implement a tracing tool or
>>>>>> whatever to see the flows between the components.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>>> No one leverage the correlation ids, but i it could / should
>>>>>>> be done.  What kind of informations are you looking for ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1/10/07, Thomas TERMIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How can I enable tracing in servicemix with the new
>>> correlation id
>>>>>>>> mechanism. How do I have to use this? (I don't want to use the
>>>>>>>> DotViewFlowListener)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Thomas Termin
_______________________________
blue elephant systems GmbH
Wollgrasweg 49
D-70599 Stuttgart

Tel    :  (+49) 0711 - 45 10 17 676
Fax    :  (+49) 0711 - 45 10 17 573
WWW    :  http://www.blue-elephant-systems.com
Email  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

blue elephant systems GmbH
Firmensitz      : Wollgrasweg 49, D-70599 Stuttgart
Registergericht : Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 24106
Geschäftsführer : Holger Dietrich, Thomas Gentsch, Joachim Hoernle

Reply via email to