I think I figured out the answer to my question. To have such a class as JmsInOutUsingJCABinding would be to try to implement a DISTRIBUTED transaction, between the external JMS client and the JMS transacted endpoint. DISTRIBUTED transactions are probably still beyond the scope of ESBs.
Annette wrote: > > What is the reason for not having a class similar to the > JmsInUsingJCABinding class, but that would provide for the InOut jbi > message implementation? I am sure it is something I don't understand about > JCA, XA, and transactions. Could I extend the JmsInUsingJCABinding class > and override onMessage and onMessageExchange methods? Thanks for any > answers. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Reason-why-there-is-not-a-JmsInOutUsingJCABinding-class--tf3663536s12049.html#a10244963 Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
