Hi there. Thought, as I am usually so prolific in asking questions here, take your question as an opportunity to provide some advice.
What you have with JBI is a way for message exchange that is standardised for the purpose of interoperability. If JBI doesn't, for whatever reason, suit your requirements for exchanging messages between applications, it probably might be better to base your message exchange on some other standard, or to develop your own. Owen. -----Original Message----- From: jbi joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 10:09 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Service unit to service unit interopperability >From your reply, it appears that communications between different service units within a service assembly are done via NMR?? Would like to have service units within a single service assembly be able to talk more readily than the expense of wsdl, etc.. TIA gnodet wrote: > > What do you mean by interoperability ? > Service contracts should be defined by their respective WSDL. > > On 5/5/07, Java Energizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Is there a url on recommended interopperability between >> service units within the same service assembly? >> TIA >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Principal Engineer, IONA > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Service-unit-to-service-unit-interopperability-tf3 696183s12049.html#a10350651 Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
