Hi again Gert. Sure, I'm simply translating information between one XML and another.
This is because I don't want the user to have direct access to my JSR-181 SE. I want the XSLT SE to transform a document with a specific structure to an OS command, and I want the result of the command's execution to be translated into another document with a specific structure. Does that information help you answer my original questions any better? Owen. -----Original Message----- From: Gert Vanthienen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 3:40 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Creating intermediary XSLT service. Owen, I'm a bit confused about exactly what you will be trying to do with the XSLT SE. Anyway, ServiceMix already has an out-of-the-box XSLT component (servicemix-saxon) that you can use for data transformation (XSL-T) and XQuery. Doesn't this one suit your needs? Gert Owen Thomas wrote: > Good afternoon ServiceMix users. > > > > After 3 months of persistence, I finally got a web service functioning > in a ServiceMix container. > > > > What I have is an HTTP BC that forwards requests from outside the NMR to > a JSR-181 SE. The JSR-181 SE implements an OS call using the string > supplied in the received SOAP message as the command. As those who have > been observant up to this point can see, this is very dangerous. It is > not recommended one expose such a web service on a production machine > for the possibility of damage to the host that could result. > > > > What I would like to do is to use this SE to run specific commands that > I write in XSLT, and run using an XSLT SE. I'm not quite sure how to do > this, and would appreciate help on the following matters: > > > > 1. I have the HTTP BC and JSR-181 SE. I appear to need the XSLT SE. Can > anyone tell me what other service units I might need? > > 2. How do I get these service units to talk to each other? > > > > I believe, that in the Java Business Integration spec v 1.0, my JBI > instance is going to look something like that given in section 4.9.1, > except that it will be a request-response MEP. Can anyone please help me > draw light over my solution in respect of this example? > > > > Thank you for your considered replies, > > > > Owen. > > > > >
