OK. Many thanks for your quick replies !
Guillaume Nodet a écrit :
This is my understanding, but you should ask on the ActiveMQ list to be sure ... On 5/14/07, Dominique DE VITO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I understand your response like this: - it's a priority defining concurrency between possible consumers of the *same* messages, - it's NOT a priority defining (CPU) concurrency between all the consumers (then, my use case could not be implemented) Is it correct ?
