Thanks Gnodt. Let me look into it.

gnodet wrote:
> 
> There should be some nightly snapshots available on the maven repo
>   http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/
> 
> The distribution is available at
> 
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/servicemix/apache-servicemix/3.2-incubating-SNAPSHOT/apache-servicemix-3.2-incubating-20070503.120612-25.tar.gz
> 
> But you will need the code and look at the unit tests, as this is not
> really
> documented yet.
> 
> On 5/15/07, gauravsonline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Gnodet,
>>
>> Yes thats what I did. Created a jms-provider and a http-consumer in one
>> SA
>> (i have used the bridge-protocol example) and jms-consumer with the
>> endpoints of the target service in the other SA. So the flow is like I
>> post
>> the xml messsage thru a client to the http-consumer and the message is
>> pushed in the queue thru the jms-producer. Now the jms-consumer pulls the
>> message out and calls the web service. This is basically a routing of the
>> message, if I am not wrong.
>>
>> Now, the problem is how can i push a message object into the queue? As
>> you
>> responded, that the mashaling BC's are still not released so I will have
>> to
>> get the source from the SVN directly. Let me see if I can do something
>> with
>> it. If you can help me in placing the build then that would be great.
>>
>> Thanks...
>>
>> Gaurav
>>
>>
>> gnodet wrote:
>> >
>> > If you know how to send an HTTP request to a JMS queue,
>> > doing the opposite is quite easy.  You just need to exchange
>> > the endpoint roles so that you will end up with an jms consumer
>> > and an http provider.
>> >
>> > Now, if you really need to send an object, you should use the new
>> > endpoints
>> > that have not been released yet (download the svn sources and build the
>> > trunk
>> > version).  The servicemix-jms BC defines two new endpoints
>> >   <jms:consumer />
>> > and
>> >    <jms:provider />
>> > Take a look at the code, and you will see the ConsumerMarshaler and
>> > ProviderMarhsaler
>> > interfaces that you can implement to override the transformation from
>> JMS
>> > <-> JBI.
>> > You will be able to put your custom marhsaling code there.
>> >
>> > On 5/15/07, gauravsonline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for your response.
>> >>
>> >> gnodet wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Now, if you want to call an external HTTP service, you need to link
>> the
>> >> > JMS endpoint to an HTTP endpoint.  Take a look at the bridge example
>> >> > in the servicemix distribution (and the turorial on the web site),
>> they
>> >> > are
>> >> > really related to that (though it's from HTTP to JMS, but the same
>> >> things
>> >> > apply).
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> This part I have done already. I am able to post an xml message to the
>> >> queue
>> >> and called a web service.
>> >>
>> >> Now, the second part of it is to post the message object.
>> >>
>> >> gnodet wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Which onMessage are you talking about ?
>> >> > Currently, the JMS BC mainly expects an xml and you can route the
>> >> > exchange to jsr181 which will unmarshall it and call the pojo.
>> >> > If you want to use a java object in the JMS message, you will have
>> >> > to marshal it to xml on the BC side.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> We know from J2EE that an MDB has a onMessage() method which is
>> triggered
>> >> when a message is pushed into the queue. We can have the business
>> logic
>> >> in
>> >> this method for calling the target web service. My requiremnt is to
>> >> implement the same thing using servicemix. But till now I just know
>> about
>> >> how to push the xml message in the jms of servicemix using
>> http-consumer
>> >> and
>> >> then using then jms-provider retrieveing the messages from the queue
>> and
>> >> invoking the jsr-181 web service.
>> >>
>> >> I hope this makes the picture much clear.
>> >>
>> >> I have read that we can convert the message object into xml. This
>> comes
>> >> built-in with activemq. But how to create the SU for it. I also think
>> of
>> >> doing a transormation from messgae object to xml. But I do not know
>> how
>> >> to
>> >> do it. Plz help...
>> >>
>> >> Thanks...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> gnodet wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Which onMessage are you talking about ?
>> >> > Currently, the JMS BC mainly expects an xml and you can route the
>> >> > exchange to jsr181 which will unmarshall it and call the pojo.
>> >> > If you want to use a java object in the JMS message, you will have
>> >> > to marshal it to xml on the BC side.
>> >> > If you don't have a real need for using a java object inside the JMS
>> >> > message,
>> >> > I'd really recommand using xml if possible inside ServiceMix.
>> >> > Now, if you want to call an external HTTP service, you need to link
>> the
>> >> > JMS endpoint to an HTTP endpoint.  Take a look at the bridge example
>> >> > in the servicemix distribution (and the turorial on the web site),
>> they
>> >> > are
>> >> > really related to that (though it's from HTTP to JMS, but the same
>> >> things
>> >> > apply).
>> >> >
>> >> > On 5/14/07, gauravsonline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Gert,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks for the help. With little effort I got evertything working
>> at
>> >> my
>> >> >> end.
>> >> >> Moreover the resolution was also very precise and easy to
>> understand.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Now, suppose my queue receives a message in the object form of type
>> >> >> "Message" and I want to  typecast it to  the required type. Then,
>> >> after
>> >> >> that
>> >> >> I will invoke a webservice and pass that object as thep parameter
>> for
>> >> the
>> >> >> operation (think this would be RPC call). e.g. I am posting
>> messages
>> >> of
>> >> >> type
>> >> >> class A in the queue (here i will use jms producer), then jms
>> consumer
>> >> >> will
>> >> >> retrieve the messages of type class A. No some how I want the
>> >> >> onMessage(Message msg) method to be trigerred. The parameter msg
>> will
>> >> be
>> >> >> type casted to type class A and then I will call a webservice (i
>> think
>> >> it
>> >> >> would be RPC using service stubs) which takes this obect of type A
>> as
>> >> a
>> >> >> parameter.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I was looking at the Active MQ implemenattion of it.  have cerating
>> >> >> queries
>> >> >> related to it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 1. How can I invoke the onMessage() method throgh the jms consumer
>> >> >> service
>> >> >> unit?
>> >> >> 2. How can i invoke the jsr-181 service from inside the onMessage()
>> >> >> method?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Can I implement such a scenario with in service mix end-to-end. Plz
>> >> >> guide.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > L.S.,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > OK, so you have implemented and deployed a web service using the
>> >> >> JSR-181
>> >> >> > component.  This results in an internal endpoint for
>> >> ServiceMix.  This
>> >> >> > means that the service is accessible within the ESB itself.  If
>> you
>> >> >> want
>> >> >> > to make the service available to the outside world, you'll have
>> to
>> >> add
>> >> >> an
>> >> >> > external endpoint (e.g. a JMS or HTTP consumer) for the same
>> >> >> service.  So
>> >> >> > if you just want to route between your JMS queue and the JSR-181
>> >> >> endpoint,
>> >> >> > you create only one JMS consumer endpoint with the same service
>> name
>> >> to
>> >> >> > connect the external endpoint with the internal endpoint and you
>> >> don't
>> >> >> > need any of the intermediary HTTP endpoint definitions.  If you
>> want
>> >> to
>> >> >> > have multiple external endpoints (e.g. file poller, http
>> consumer,
>> >> ftp
>> >> >> > poller, ...), you can create them and specify
>> >> >> targetService/targetEndpoint
>> >> >> > attributes to specify the routing to the internal endpoint.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > In your example, you've also added an HTTP provider
>> endpoint.  This
>> >> is
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> > way to make an external web service available in the ESB (thus
>> >> >> resulting
>> >> >> > in another internal endpoint) and that's where your code sample
>> >> fails
>> >> >> > (duplicate internal endpoint names).
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Does this clarify the internal/external endpoint issue for you?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Gert
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > gauravsonline wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Hi Gert,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I have created the consumer-jms-su and the provider-http-su and
>> SA
>> >> for
>> >> >> it
>> >> >> >> (call it as SA_retrieve). Before that I would like to explain
>> what
>> >> I
>> >> >> have
>> >> >> >> done till now. I have created the bridge example in SMX for
>> sending
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> >> messages to the queue. I have also created a JSR 181 web service
>> >> for
>> >> >> >> echoing some message with http-consumer-su and
>> >> jsr181-wsdl-first-su.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I am able to deploy the SA_retrieve and the bridge example. I am
>> >> able
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> >> send messages to the queue and then the SA_retrieve is able to
>> >> >> retrieve
>> >> >> >> the messages. The message is displyed in the SMX console and
>> queue
>> >> >> >> encount value is checked from JMX console.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Now in order to make them all work together, I am deploying the
>> SA
>> >> in
>> >> >> >> order like this bridge example, echo WS, and then the
>> SA_retrieve
>> >> WS.
>> >> >> >> When I deploy the SA_retrieve WS it throws exceptions saying
>> that
>> >> the
>> >> >> >> "EchoService" service name and the "EchoPort" endpoint are
>> already
>> >> >> >> registered to soem internal service. As you told to give the
>> same
>> >> >> service
>> >> >> >> name and the endpoint as in the wsdl. But this is creating
>> problem.
>> >> >> For
>> >> >> >> your reference I am attaching the configuration of all the SA
>> for
>> >> your
>> >> >> >> refence:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> SA_retrieve:
>> >> >> >> =========
>> >> >> >> consumer-jms-su: xbean.xml
>> >> >> >> ----------------------------------
>> >> >> >> <beans xmlns:jms="http://servicemix.apache.org/jms/1.0";
>> >> >> >>        xmlns:test="http://motorola.com/test/test_amq";>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>     <!-- START SNIPPET: consumer -->
>> >> >> >>     <jms:endpoint service="test:MyConsumerService"
>> >> >> >>                   endpoint="jms"
>> >> >> >>                   role="consumer"
>> >> >> >>                   destinationStyle="queue"
>> >> >> >>                   jmsProviderDestinationName="bridge.output"
>> >> >> >>                   connectionFactory="#connectionFactory"
>> >> >> >>
>> >> defaultMep="http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/in-out";
>> >> >> >>                   defaultOperation="test:Echo" />
>> >> >> >>     <!-- END SNIPPET: consumer -->
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>     <jms:endpoint service="test:MyConsumerService"
>> >> >> >>                   endpoint="jms+soap"
>> >> >> >>                   targetInterfaceName="test:MyConsumerInterface"
>> >> >> >>                   role="consumer"
>> >> >> >>                   destinationStyle="queue"
>> >> >> >>                   jmsProviderDestinationName="bridge.output"
>> >> >> >>                   connectionFactory="#connectionFactory"
>> >> >> >>                   soap="true"
>> >> >> >>
>> >> defaultMep="http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/in-out";
>> >> >> />
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>         <bean id="connectionFactory"
>> >> >> >> class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory">
>> >> >> >>     <property name="brokerURL" value="tcp://localhost:61616" />
>> >> >> >>   </bean>
>> >> >> >> </beans>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> provider-http-su: xbean.xml
>> >> >> >> ----------------------------------
>> >> >> >> <beans xmlns:http="http://servicemix.apache.org/http/1.0";
>> >> >> >>        xmlns:test="http://motorola.com/test/test_amq";>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>   <http:endpoint xmlns:echo="http://motorola.com/test/echo";
>> >> >> >>   service="echo:EchoService"
>> >> >> >>                  endpoint="EchoPort"
>> >> >> >>                  role="provider"
>> >> >> >>                  locationURI="http://localhost:9999/echo/";
>> >> >> >>                  defaultMep="
>> http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/in-out";
>> >> >> >>                  soap="true"
>> >> >> >>                  wsdlResource="classpath:echo.wsdl"/>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> </beans>
>> >> >> >> Actually I have kept the wsdl at the path, so its that way.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> JSR181 WS:
>> >> >> >> ========
>> >> >> >> jsr181-su: xbean.xml
>> >> >> >> --------------------------
>> >> >> >> <beans xmlns:jsr181="http://servicemix.apache.org/jsr181/1.0";>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>     <classpath>
>> >> >> >>         <location>.</location>
>> >> >> >>     </classpath>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>     <jsr181:endpoint
>> >> >> pojoClass="com.motorola.test.echo.EchoServiceImpl"
>> >> >> >>                      wsdlResource="classpath:echo.wsdl"
>> >> >> >>                      style="document" />
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> </beans>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> jsr181-su: echo.wsdl
>> >> >> >> -------------------------
>> >> >> >> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>> >> >> >> <wsdl:definitions
>> >> xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/";
>> >> >> >> xmlns:tns="http://motorola.com/test/echo";
>> >> >> >> xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/";
>> >> >> >> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; name="echo"
>> >> >> >> targetNamespace="http://motorola.com/test/echo";>
>> >> >> >>         <wsdl:types>
>> >> >> >>                 <xsd:schema
>> >> >> >> targetNamespace="http://motorola.com/test/echo";>
>> >> >> >>                         <xsd:element name="Echo">
>> >> >> >>                         <xsd:complexType>
>> >> >> >>                                 <xsd:sequence>
>> >> >> >>                                         <xsd:element name="in"
>> >> >> >> type="xsd:string"></xsd:element>
>> >> >> >>                                 </xsd:sequence>
>> >> >> >>                         </xsd:complexType>
>> >> >> >>                         </xsd:element>
>> >> >> >>                         <!--<xsd:element name="EchoResponse">
>> >> >> >>                                 <xsd:complexType>
>> >> >> >>                                         <xsd:sequence>
>> >> >> >>                                                 <xsd:element
>> >> >> name="out"
>> >> >> >> type="xsd:string"/>
>> >> >> >>                                         </xsd:sequence>
>> >> >> >>                                 </xsd:complexType>
>> >> >> >>                         </xsd:element>-->
>> >> >> >>                 </xsd:schema>
>> >> >> >>         </wsdl:types>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>         <wsdl:message name="echoRequest">
>> >> >> >>                 <wsdl:part element="tns:Echo" name="in"/>
>> >> >> >>         </wsdl:message>
>> >> >> >>         <wsdl:message name="echoResponse">
>> >> >> >>                 <wsdl:part type="xsd:boolean" name="out"/>
>> >> >> >>         </wsdl:message>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>         <wsdl:portType name="EchoPortType">
>> >> >> >>                 <wsdl:operation name="echo">
>> >> >> >>                         <wsdl:input message="tns:echoRequest"/>
>> >> >> >>                         <wsdl:output
>> message="tns:echoResponse"/>
>> >> >> >>                 </wsdl:operation>
>> >> >> >>         </wsdl:portType>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>         <wsdl:binding name="EchoBinding"
>> type="tns:EchoPortType">
>> >> >> >>                 <soap:binding style="document"
>> >> >> >> transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
>> >> >> >>                 <wsdl:operation name="echo">
>> >> >> >>                         <soap:operation
>> >> >> >> soapAction="http://motorola.com/test/echo/echo"/>
>> >> >> >>                         <wsdl:input>
>> >> >> >>                                 <soap:body use="literal"/>
>> >> >> >>                         </wsdl:input>
>> >> >> >>                         <wsdl:output>
>> >> >> >>                                 <soap:body use="literal"/>
>> >> >> >>                         </wsdl:output>
>> >> >> >>                         </wsdl:operation>
>> >> >> >>         </wsdl:binding>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>         <wsdl:service name="EchoService">
>> >> >> >>                 <wsdl:port binding="tns:EchoBinding"
>> >> name="EchoPort">
>> >> >> >>                         <soap:address
>> >> >> >> location="http://0.0.0.0:9999/echo"/>
>> >> >> >>                 </wsdl:port>
>> >> >> >>         </wsdl:service>
>> >> >> >> </wsdl:definitions>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> consumer-http-su: xbean.xml
>> >> >> >> ---------------------------------
>> >> >> >> <beans xmlns:http="http://servicemix.apache.org/http/1.0";
>> >> >> >>        xmlns:test="http://motorola.com/test/echo";>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>   <http:endpoint service="test:EchoService"
>> >> >> >>                  endpoint="EchoPort"
>> >> >> >>                  role="consumer"
>> >> >> >>                  locationURI="http://0.0.0.0:9999/echo/";
>> >> >> >>                  defaultMep="
>> http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/in-out";
>> >> >> >>                  soap="true" />
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> </beans>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> So I am using the same values for http:endpoint
>> >> >> >> service="test:EchoService", endpoint="EchoPort" in my echo
>> service
>> >> >> >> consumer-http-su and in the provider-http-su of SA_reteive SA
>> which
>> >> is
>> >> >> >> retrieving the messages. This duplicay is giving the problem.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Please help, as I am not able to figure out to define the proper
>> >> >> routing
>> >> >> >> of the messages beteen SU and across SA.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Regards,
>> >> >> >> Gaurav
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Guarav,
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Is this the only change that is necessary in the XSL file to
>> >> switch
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> >>> version 2.0?
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> For what the saxon dependency is concerned:
>> >> >> >>> The previous version of the page used the
>> >> >> >>> servicemix-lwcontainer-service-unit archetype to create the
>> >> >> >>> bridge-xslt-su.  I have changed that to use
>> >> >> >>> servicemix-saxon-xslt-service-unit and that one should
>> >> automatically
>> >> >> put
>> >> >> >>> the correct dependency in there to start with.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Gert
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> gauravsonline wrote:
>> >> >> >>>> Thank you so much. Would like to suggest two more small
>> changes,
>> >> >> though
>> >> >> >>>> not
>> >> >> >>>> important but it would make the things more concrete.
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> Actually in the XSLT SU, the xsl:stylesheet version is "1.0",
>> >> which
>> >> >> >>>> should
>> >> >> >>>> be "2.0". If not the case then servicemix gives a warning that
>> >> >> "saxon
>> >> >> >>>> engine
>> >> >> >>>> is 2.0 but the stylesheet version is 1.0".
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> Secondly, the saxon dependency has to be added in the pom.xml
>> >> file
>> >> >> for
>> >> >> >>>> XSLT
>> >> >> >>>> SU.
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> <dependencies>
>> >> >> >>>>         <dependency>
>> >> >> >>>>             <groupId>org.apache.servicemix</groupId>
>> >> >> >>>>             <artifactId>servicemix-saxon</artifactId>
>> >> >> >>>>             <version>3.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT</version>
>> >> >> >>>>         </dependency>
>> >> >> >>>> </dependencies>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> Hope this makes sense. As of know I just have these many
>> changes
>> >> >> only.
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> Also thanks for ur reply on the second use case. I will now
>> work
>> >> on
>> >> >> >>>> that.
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> Regards....
>> >> >> >>>> Gaurav
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> L.S.,
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> First of all, I have changed
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/Creating+a+protocol+bridge.
>> >> >> >>>>> Could you check if all necessary changes have been done? 
>> This
>> >> page
>> >> >> >>>>> will
>> >> >> >>>>> get replicated to the main site after a while...
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> For your second use case: if you do not need any
>> transformations
>> >> on
>> >> >> >>>>> the
>> >> >> >>>>> message content, you can create a service assembly with two
>> >> service
>> >> >> >>>>> units:
>> >> >> >>>>> - one SU based on servicemix-jms, defining the JMS consumer
>> >> >> endpoint
>> >> >> >>>>> to
>> >> >> >>>>> read messages from a JMS queue (cfr.
>> >> >> >>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/servicemix-jms.html
>> for
>> >> >> >>>>> configuration options)
>> >> >> >>>>> - the other SU based on servicemix-http, defining the HTTP
>> >> provider
>> >> >> >>>>> endpoint which points to your webservice (cfr.
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/servicemix-http.htmlfor
>> >> >> >>>>> configuration options)
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> Beware that the service/endpoint name of you HTTP provider
>> >> endpoint
>> >> >> >>>>> should match the names defined in your webservice's WSDL. 
>> You
>> >> can
>> >> >> >>>>> either use the same service/endpoint name on your JMS
>> endpoint
>> >> or
>> >> >> use
>> >> >> >>>>> the targetService/targetEndpoint attributes to do the
>> routing.
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> Regards,
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> Gert
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> gauravsonline wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> HI,
>> >> >> >>>>>> Thanks for your help. Actualy just now I resolved the
>> problem.
>> >> >> >>>>>> The problem was in the xslt-su. The archtyope by default
>> >> generates
>> >> >> >>>>>> the
>> >> >> >>>>>> servicemix.xml file and in the example code its
>> xbean.xmlfile.
>> >> So
>> >> >> >>>>>> just
>> >> >> >>>>>> renaming the file from servicemix.xml to xbean.xml. The
>> saxon
>> >> >> >>>>>> dependency
>> >> >> >>>>>> was
>> >> >> >>>>>> ok.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> Now the next step is to read the messages from the queue and
>> >> call
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> >>>>>> web
>> >> >> >>>>>> service. Could you please help??
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> Also I would like to request the moderator if they could
>> update
>> >> >> this
>> >> >> >>>>>> thing
>> >> >> >>>>>> at :
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>
>> http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/creating-a-protocol-bridge.html
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>
>> http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/creating-a-protocol-bridge.html
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> in the "XSLT SU" section, as this has costed me two days to
>> >> >> resolve.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> Thanks all for your help!
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> View this message in context:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/%22Creating-a-protocol-bridge%22-tutorial%27s-configs-are-different-from-Bridge-example%27s-tf3162370s12049.html#a10601663
>> >> >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Cheers,
>> >> > Guillaume Nodet
>> >> > ------------------------
>> >> > Principal Engineer, IONA
>> >> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/%22Creating-a-protocol-bridge%22-tutorial%27s-configs-are-different-from-Bridge-example%27s-tf3162370s12049.html#a10623352
>> >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheers,
>> > Guillaume Nodet
>> > ------------------------
>> > Principal Engineer, IONA
>> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/%22Creating-a-protocol-bridge%22-tutorial%27s-configs-are-different-from-Bridge-example%27s-tf3162370s12049.html#a10624002
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Principal Engineer, IONA
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/%22Creating-a-protocol-bridge%22-tutorial%27s-configs-are-different-from-Bridge-example%27s-tf3162370s12049.html#a10624544
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to