You should try to use standard JBI components, i.e.
those inside the deployables folders, as they are JBI
compliant, can be used in other containers if needed,
and are usually more robust than the lightweight ones.

On 5/22/07, apinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Thanks Gert !

Since I will have to poll the queues should I be extending the
PollingEndpoint ?
Unlike JMS , this component will have to keep polling the queues for the
message...

Also , I noticed some different implementations for JMS and FTP in the
following locations. Note sure which one should I use and would be easy to
change for MQ..

There is a JMS implementation in :

common\servicemix-components\src\main\java\org\apache\servicemix\components\jms
and then one in :

src\deployables\bindingcomponents\servicemix-jms\src\main\java\org\apache\servicemix\jms

The FTP or File  poller seems like a starting point :

src\deployables\bindingcomponents\servicemix-ftp\src\main\java\org\apache\servicemix\ftp
or

src\common\servicemix-components\src\main\java\org\apache\servicemix\components\file

The filepoller extends the PollingComponentSupport

thanks
Pat


Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>
> L.S.,
>
>
> To my knowledge, this binding component doesn't already exist.  I always
> use JMS to access WebSphere MQ, but it will be a great feature to be
able
> to support the MQI directly.
>
> There is a tutorial on the ServiceMix website [1], which introduces you
> into building a BC component (e.g. using the maven archetype to get your
> project up and running) and shows you the relevant methods to implement.
> Afterwards, you probably want to take a look at HTTP/JMS for more
detailed
> examples.
>
> JmsProviderEndpoint and JmsConsumerEndpoint would be good starting
points:
> these are the JMS endpoints that are have recently been added (targeted
> towards release 3.2) so they are fairly 'clean'.  Feel free to ask for
> help whenever you need it...  Also, if you need someone to help you test
> this, I can always help you out (replacing my own JMS based
> implementations with the new MQI BC).
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
>
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/hello-world-bc.html
>
>
> apinke wrote:
>>
>> Is there a binding component for MQSeries that uses the MQI Interface
>> instead of the JMS interface ?
>>
>> There seems to be one under development at Glassfish (
>> http://www.glassfishwiki.org/jbiwiki/Wiki.jsp?page=MQSeriesBC) but I am
>> not sure of the status.
>>
>> In case there is none , are there any guidelines on how to write a BC ?
I
>> can try and rollup one on my own but do I have to take a look at the
HTTP
>> or JMS source and understand how to write the BC or  is there some
>> document that describes the steps ?
>>
>> thanks
>> Pat
>>
>
>

--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/BC-for-MQSeries-tf3782384s12049.html#a10732824
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.




--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Principal Engineer, IONA
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to