Thanks for your quick response. I would like to dig deeper to my question.
Let say we use a single servicemix instance as the "entry-point" of all the request and let the cluster of the remaining servicemix receives the requests that are already "load-balanced". I have doubt on the capability of handling all the large volume request for the single entry-point servicemix instance to handle. For hardware load-balancer, the request is forwarded to the other servicemix and that servicemix handles the request and response connection directly with the client. But for our case: "single entry point servicemix" even the request is forwarded to the cluster of servicemix automatically for processing, the return of result from processing to client is still needed to be passed though that "single entry point servicemix" ? Will that single entry point servicemix be overloaded? Please correct me if there is any misunderstanding. gnodet wrote: > > AFAIK, unless you use a hardware load balancer, you will always have a > single > point of failure. But the goal is to minimize the work done by this > server > so that > failures happen on other nodes I would say. > So you could use ServiceMix as a front-end HTTP and let the clustering > happen using JMS (JMS is automatically load balanced). > Another way would be to use Apache HTTPD > (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy_balancer.html) in front of > several > ServiceMix running HTTP . > > On 5/22/07, ywtsang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> We are trying to setup a cluster of servicemix and are successful in >> running >> the example of "cluster". >> >> We want to test the other setup of cluster of servicemix to see if the >> servicemix can provide transparent fail-over functionalitiy, but we met >> difficulties in setting up this and want to seek help here. >> >> We want to simulate a simple situation that a simple client, using >> "webservice", to make request to a cluster of servicemix to query for >> something. For the client, we should specify a single ip address of >> servicemix server for the client to connect to. Does that mean for the >> cluster of servicemix, we need to have a single servicemix instance >> acting >> as the entry point of the cluster, and let that entry point service to do >> all the "clustering" stuff (e.g. fail-over, load-balance, etc)? >> >> Is what I am describing correct? >> >> Is it possible that we do not have that single entry point of servicemix >> for >> the cluster? i.e. the client can automatically "connect" to the cluster >> by >> some means? >> >> My main concern is that we want the "cluster of servicemix" to be "100% >> available" with high scalablility using "clustering". What does the >> appropriate setup of this cluster of servicemix look like? >> >> I may be describing the problems with many unclear parts, it would be >> nice >> to point me out for further clarification of the problems. >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/cluster-setup-tf3795182s12049.html#a10734374 >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Principal Engineer, IONA > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/cluster-setup-tf3795182s12049.html#a10735964 Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
