That's great to hear. On a side topic, I have another team that is planning on providing their web services using the new Spring Web Service framework. Any ideas on how this fits into the servicemix scheme of things (BC/SE) since SWS is basically a replacement of CXF?
Larry gnodet wrote: > > ServiceMix and CXF are already integrated, though there is still some > work going on. > Two new components will be available in 3.2, a binding component and > a service engine. > The SE will be the newer version of jsr181, while the BC is based on > CXF and thus will have support for Reliable Messaging, WS-Policy, etc... > > If you were using JAX-WS annotated POJOs in jsr181, you should be > able to upgrade to servicemix-cxfse without too much problems hopefully. > > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > > On Aug 20, 2007, at 8:48 PM, larry hughes wrote: > >> >> I've recently read on the Xfire site that they'd recommend using >> CXF instead, >> probably due to the move of XFire's author to Mule. How does this >> affect >> servicemix? Will the next servicemix depend on CXF instead of >> XFire for >> jsr-181? Just wondering what the upgrade path will look like for >> WS down >> the road. >> >> Larry >> -- >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CXF-integration- >> tf4300789s12049.html#a12241701 >> Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CXF-integration-tf4300789s12049.html#a12297855 Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
