I would recommend ServletExec in an instant. Their customer support is
exceptional and their mailing list is active and extremely helpful. (nice
work to Vince and Paul and the ServletExec team!)
Jason
At 02:38 PM 4/9/99 -0400, you wrote:
>I just wanted to thank everyone for their suggestions. We're testing with
>WebSphere 2.02 now, and it seems more stable. I don't think there's a
>clear winner between JRun and ServletExec, but I personally have found
>ServletExec to be simpler to deal
>with (and not light on features), so if WAS 2.0 doesn't work, we'll
>probably look at that...
>
>Jose Arevalo wrote:
>
>> We did move JRUN. The performance is AWESOME.
>> Our config is; Solaris 2.6/Apache1.3.x/Java Native threads.
>> I will recomend this configuration for heavy load mission critical
>> apprications
>>
>> > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 8 11:37:27 1999
>> > MIME-Version: 1.0
>> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>> > Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 08:20:37 -0700
>> > From: Tim Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Subject: Re: WebSphere vs. ServletExec vs. JRun
>> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> > I worked with WebSphere v1.1 and wasn't very happy. Version 2.0 is
>> much better. I also work with the latest version of JRun. Both seem to
>> perform well. I like WebSphere's administrative program and execution
>> monitors, logging, etc. better.
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Kito D. Mann [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > Sent: Thursday, April 08, 1999 7:53 AM
>> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Subject: WebSphere vs. ServletExec vs. JRun
>> >
>> > Hey... I'm working with a client that's currently using IBM WebSphere
>> > Application Server 1.0 and is extremely unhappy with it. Has anyone had
>> > any experience with WebSphere 2.0 (their newsgroup isn't very well
>> > populated), and if not, has anyone worked with WebSphere _and_ either
>> > JRun or ServletExec. Any opinions? I'm thinking they need to move from
>> > WebSphere 1.0 to at least 2.0, but if 2.0 isn't more stable and less
>> > buggy, it's going to have to be something else. Any suggestions would be
>> > appreciated.
>> >
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Kito D. Mann
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Virtua Communications Corp
>
>___________________________________________________________________________
>To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
>of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
>
>Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
>Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
>LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
--
Jason Puyleart
Internet Concepts, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: 608.285.6600
Fax: 608.285.6601
___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
