> Mark A. Kolb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the sake of accuracy, you may want to take a look at the most
> recent JSP specification. The tag extension feature introduced in JSP
> 1.0 and spec'd out in JSP 1.1 directly addresses what appears to be
> your primary complaint: you don't want Java source code in the middle
> of your HTML files.
Good point, Mark; thanks for the suggestion.
An important factor to consider in my comments is that we froze our tools
selection a while ago, and we are not yet at a stage to consider the
incorporation of "new" technology again. Based upon comments from this
list, JSP 1.1 may be just the thing to use. I appreciate the pointers that
people have been able to offer.
Taking a quick look, JRun 2.3.2 does not yet support JSP 1.1, though...
(Right?)
> Mark A. Kolb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Like yours, our team here has a group focused on presentation (HTML),
> and a group focused on back-end implementation (Java). We use JSP for
> dynamic content, and we don't put Java source code in our .jsp files.
Here, here! :-)
> Mark A. Kolb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But JSP *is* servlet-based data inlining into an HTML GUI template! I
> don't follow you here. And given that the servlet code written by the
> JSP pagecompiler is automatically generated, it certainly has the
> potential to outperform handwritten code.
My earlier point was that we had already created a custom solution to do the
non-programmer capable GUI templates, before JSP 1.1 was available for
consideration.
Shad
--
Shad J. Aumann
190 Earle Drive
North Kingstown, RI 02852
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
