"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> >
> > Ideally, there should be a means of registering a listener with the
> > HttpSession to address this problem.
> >
>
> Although it doesn't conform to the usual JavaBeans naming patterns (I guess
> because of historical precendent), isn't that what HttpSessionBindingListener
> lets you accomplish?
>

Yes, but in a skewed manner. I would use this interface for objects
"put" into the session, and not for lifecycle events on the HttpSession.
To me, these two are conceptually different. I agree that this is an
issue that should be addressed in the spec.

Regards,

Subrahmanyam

------------------------------------------------
Subrahmanyam A.V.B.//http://www.Subrahmanyam.com
------------------------------------------------

___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".

Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html

Reply via email to