To prevent instantiation occurred to me also but this could have been
achieved by making the constructor private. And what is the harm even if we
have an object??
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Sahol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 1999 9:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: why is HttpServlet Abstract
My guess is to prevent instantiation.
----- Original Message -----
From: R. Mathur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> why is HttpServlet(jsdk 2.0) Abstract when it doesn't hold any abstract
> methods??
___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
