On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Mike Abney wrote:
> Agreed. I intended to preface the subject with the standard [OT] and
> mention that it wasn't the correct place for this, but, in neither
> my first nor last netiquette slip-up, I forgot.
FWIW, doing that would not have made any difference -- why does
announcing you're about to do something inappropriate make it any less
inappropriate?
> I do, however, think that the previous reminder was
> adequate. Calling anything a stupid question is an inappropriate
> addition to an already inappropriate thread.
>
> Sorry for wasting everyone's bandwidth.
>
>
> ~Mike
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Claude HONNORE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 3:50 PM
> Subject: Re: Object Oriented ?? or stupid Oriented question??
>
>
> > Please, it is not the right forum ...
>
Milt Epstein
Research Programmer
Software/Systems Development Group
Computing and Communications Services Office (CCSO)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
