I got the whole argument but can you explain
only "4 additional bytes being used on the stack"

Cheers
Rajesh
-----Original Message-----
One of the pitfalls I see of this design is higher object
creation/destruction, but your statements/resultsets had to be closed anyway
so you just have 4 additional bytes being used on the stack.

____________________________________________________________________________
________________________


This email and any attached to it are confidential and intended only for the
individual or
entity to which it is addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient,
please let us know
by telephoning or emailing the sender.  You should also delete the email and
any attachment
from your systems and should not copy the email or any attachment or
disclose their content
to any other person or entity.  The views expressed here are not necessarily
those of
Churchill Insurance Group plc or its affiliates or subsidiaries. Thank you.
Churchill Insurance Group plc.  Company Registration Number - 2280426.
England.
Registered Office: Churchill Court, Westmoreland Road, Bromley, Kent BR1
1DP.

___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".

Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html

Reply via email to