Jello,
Well it seems that my CLI average has slightly increased with the new
version. Here are my results..............
v3.0 - 7 Hrs.
v3.03 - 11 Hrs.
OS - Win2k
RAM - 384MB
CPU - PIII500
-Calvyn-
PS - I also use SetiSpy 3.0.3, available at
http://pages.tca.net/roelof/setispy/
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of McAllister, Marc
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 8:39 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: CLI vs GUI
Tom,
SetiSpy will monitor your CLI setup... the standard setup amongst members of
my Team is SETIDriver, v3.03 CLI and SetiSpy. It all works fine :)
Regards,
Marc McAllister
(OcUK - Overclockers UK)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Schoenherr [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 4:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: CLI vs GUI
>
>
> I have recently changed from the GUI version to the CLI.
> I was using SetiSpy to monitor my GUI progress.
> Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be an equivalent
> program for the CLI version; so I can only guess at the
> differences. It appears that the CLI version is between
> 20 and 25 % faster than the GUI version with both
> using 3.03 of the client.
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by Global Crossing,
> delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre.
>
==
Unsubscribe instructions: http://www.talkspace.net/mlists/setiathome.html
This list sponsored by talkspace.net: building space communities online.
Mailing list services provided by klx.communications -- www.klx.com
==
Unsubscribe instructions: http://www.talkspace.net/mlists/setiathome.html
This list sponsored by talkspace.net: building space communities online.
Mailing list services provided by klx.communications -- www.klx.com
