I have just executed the in-polygon spatial link without problems (I
fixed a small thing, but it was not related to that error that you
mentioned...). Changes are already in the nightly build. That error
should appear if there are several versions of TJS, but that would
cause all vector algorithms to complain, not just one of
them...Strange...
Regarding the bounding box algorithm, it calculates the bounding box
of each geometry in the layer. Points do not have a bounding box, so
the result for a points layer is an empty layer. Is that what you are
getting?
Regards
Victor
2011/6/18 Agustin Diez Castillo <ad...@uv.es>:
>
> On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:11 PM, Victor Olaya wrote:
>
>> Seems like you haven't removed jts 1.9 and you have both 1.9 and 1.11
>> in your gvsig installation...
>>
> I'm afraid this is not the case, I've checked it in three different
> computers. Most of polygons algorithms (union, difference, intersection,
> remove holes, medial axis, geometric proporties, ...) works. Bounding box
> doesn't works on points layer.
>>
>>
>> 2011/6/17 Agustin Diez Castillo <ad...@uv.es>:
>>> Got it, thanks.
>>>
>>> Now I get a message error, maybe I meshed up the installation.
>>> gvSIG.log
>>> DEBUG [AWT-EventQueue-1] (NotificationManager.java:104) - Error grave de la
>>> aplicaci?n. Es conveniente que salgas de la aplicaci?n.
>>> java.lang.LinkageError: loader constraint violation: when resolving
>>> interface method
>>> "com.iver.cit.gvsig.fmap.core.IGeometry.toJTSGeometry()Lcom/vividsolutions/jts/geom/Geometry;"
>>> the class loader (instance of com/iver/andami/plugins/PluginClassLoader)
>>> of the current class, es/unex/sextante/gvsig/core/gvFeatureIterator, and
>>> the class loader (instance of com/iver/andami/plugins/PluginClassLoader)
>>> for resolved class, com/iver/cit/gvsig/fmap/core/IGeometry, have different
>>> Class objects for the type com/vividsolutions/jts/geom/Geometry used in the
>>> signature
>>> ...
>>> Caused by: es.unex.sextante.core.SextanteLogHandler@14c4ac9vie, 17-jun-2011
>>> 14:00:29 INFO: Executing command: runalg("countpoints", "puntos.shp",
>>> "RESULT", "#")vie, 17-jun-2011 14:00:29 INFO: Starting algorithm
>>> execution...:17-jun-2011 14:00:29vie, 17-jun-2011 14:00:29 INFO: Finished
>>> algorithm execution:17-jun-2011 14:00:29
>>>
>>> On Jun 17, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Victor Olaya wrote:
>>>
>>>> Agustin
>>>>
>>>> They have both been replaced by in-polygon spatial join
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> 2011/6/17 Agustin Diez Castillo <ad...@uv.es>:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> Do I miss in the nightly build (dated 20110601) count point in polygons
>>>>> and point statistics in polygons?
>>>>> Agustin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Sextante-users mailing list
>>>>> Sextante-users@lists.forge.osor.eu
>>>>> https://lists.forge.osor.eu/listinfo/sextante-users
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sextante-users mailing list
>>>> Sextante-users@lists.forge.osor.eu
>>>> https://lists.forge.osor.eu/listinfo/sextante-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sextante-users mailing list
> Sextante-users@lists.forge.osor.eu
> https://lists.forge.osor.eu/listinfo/sextante-users
>
_______________________________________________
Sextante-users mailing list
Sextante-users@lists.forge.osor.eu
https://lists.forge.osor.eu/listinfo/sextante-users
