I absolutely agree that its very useful. The question is how well the functionality works now, since the code hasnt been maintained for several years now, and there were no serious tests created.
Regards, Brady -----Original Message----- From: "Yang, Yi Y" <[email protected]<mailto:%22Yang,%20yi%20y%22%20%[email protected]%3e>> To: Brady Allen Johnson <[email protected]<mailto:brady%20allen%20johnson%20%[email protected]%3e>>, [email protected] <[email protected]<mailto:%[email protected]%22%20%[email protected]%3e>> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]<mailto:%[email protected]%22%20%[email protected]%3e>> Subject: RE: Is anybody using Service Function Groups? Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:51:02 +0000 Personally I think it is useful if a SF in SFG broke, in that case sfc should select another SF in this SFG, I’m not sure if current sfc can do so. A Contextream guy Shlomi did this, maybe he can tell us how they are using this. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brady Allen Johnson Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 5:18 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [sfc-dev] Is anybody using Service Function Groups? There is some code in the SFC OpenFlow renderer for the Service Function Groups (SFG) that has not been maintained since late-Lithium or early-Beryllium. The code is out of date and is not tested in CSIT. Is anybody actually using this functionality? If not, I would like to remove this "dead" code. I'll wait for a week before removing anything. Thanks, Brady
_______________________________________________ sfc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev
