I that case, I think that this is a valid RC3 build: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/autorelease-release-carbon/327/
I'll let An deal with the formalities when he's conscious and we have the Carbon release sync in just under an hour. --Colin On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Robert Varga <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 22/05/17 15:36, Colin Dixon wrote: > > Based on the bug, I'd say that it passes distribution check because it's > > a feature compatibility error. Even SFT wouldn't have caught it unless > > there's a feature that pulls in both SFC and VBD at the same time and I > > don't think there is. > > > > At this point, I think we either need somebody to get the patch to > > verify, cherry-picked and +2ed or we need to make the call that this > > isn't a critical feature and could be fixed in SR1. Given the nature of > > where we are, I'm inclined to say that option 2 is become more likely by > > the hour without a response from somebody who can actually drive the fix. > > I think we can postpone it -- the patch is an attempt at fixing the > problem, but I think it was just a first stab will follow-up patches > needed afterwards... > > Bye, > Robert > >
_______________________________________________ sfc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev
