same thing is needed for nitrogen sr2 as well.
On 2/21/18 3:58 PM, Jamo Luhrsen wrote: > SFC, > > we still need someone to validate your CSIT failures for the carbon sr3 > candidate are not a regression from sr2. > > JamO > _______________________________________________ sfc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev
