Thanks for including Isaku.
Yeah, I'd like to get involved with the discussion.

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:02:46AM -0400,
Sam Hague <[email protected]> wrote:

> Adding Isaku for his thoughts on neutron content.
> 
> Jaime,
> 
> thanks for bringing this up. Yes this is a good topic to include.
> 
> Currently there is a NetVirt session and a Neutron session for a total of
> two hours. I wonder if we can include the topic in these two sessions. Most
> likely in the neutron side since I don't think we have an hour of content
> there. We typically cover genius along with NetVirt so that hour is likely
> tight.
> 
> Thanks, Sam
> 
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Jaime Caamaño Ruiz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I was wondering if there would be general interest for some of us to get
> > together at any time available @ONS to discuss SFC related topics when
> > integrated with genius/netvirt, some of which could be:
> >
> > * Analyze options towards classification of external traffic
> > * Discuss how Genius can help SFC handle chain egress better
> > * Nirvana stack? I didn't see anything related to this in any of the
> > proposed topics. Since SFC supports other options different from
> > ovs/openflow, it's kinda interesting to periodically overview whats the
> > status of this effort.
> > * A general overview on how we would like to progress in this area for the
> > next couple of releases
> >
> > BR
> > Jaime.
> > _______________________________________________
> > sfc-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev
> >

-- 
Isaku Yamahata <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
sfc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev

Reply via email to