Jaime,

there are a lot of nefarious ERRORs pointing at SFC stuff in the karaf
logs:

https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/sfc-csit-3node-docker-full-deploy-all-oxygen/267/odl1_karaf.log.gz
https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/sfc-csit-3node-docker-full-deploy-all-oxygen/267/odl2_karaf.log.gz
https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/sfc-csit-3node-docker-full-deploy-all-oxygen/267/odl3_karaf.log.gz

There are a lot of different erorrs in the logs, so hard to focus in on one.

From the robot perspective, it's just two suites that fail every
test case. The first test case to create service functions fail,
so it follows that every other test case has trouble after that.


It's only the -oxygen job that is broken, btw. Fluorine, Carbon and
Nitrogen are all passing 100%.

I marked the tracking spreadsheet with BLOCKER for this. Maybe you want to
open a Jira for the same?

Thanks,
JamO

On 4/24/18 2:48 AM, Jaime Caamaño Ruiz wrote:
Thanks for bringing this up Jamo. No clues in the job available logs so
I will have to look into how to reproduce.

The odlparent/yangtools bump for sfc happenned on 7th April and since
then we had a few succesful builds until 10th of April when it started
failing. That coincides with the integration/distribution
odlparent/yangtools bump.

BR
Jaime.


-----Original Message-----
From: Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected]>
To: opendaylight sfc <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]
aylight.org>, Ariel Adam <[email protected]>
Subject: [sfc-dev] regression in sfc oxygen csit
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 16:35:11 -0700

https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/sfc-csit-3node-docker-full-
deploy-all-oxygen/267/robot/

SFC,

I saw your name on the oxygen tracking sheet, and clicked out of
curiosity. Looks like your CSIT has taken a hit recently and it
started abruptly around 4/11. Does that coincide with the
odlparent/yangtools bump?

anyway, can you please check this out? it would be a shame to regress
with SFC in an SR.

Thanks,
JamO
_______________________________________________
sfc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev

_______________________________________________
sfc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev

Reply via email to