On 31/05/18 22:05, Jamo Luhrsen wrote: > this is exactly one of the reasons it seems to make sense to just disable > SFT from autorelease. I have no hard data, but I would guess that Brady's > response below is what we get in the overwhelming majority of these > failures. > > so.... we re-run, cross fingers, hope for a blue build and if we happen to > close to a release we magically deem it a candidate and move to the next > step of validating CSIT.
This is not specific to SFTs only, this is also true for a number of other UTs -- let's not forget about that. Regards, Robert
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ sfc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev
