On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Tom Pantelis <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:29 AM, Deepthi V V <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Robert, Faseela,
>>
>> That does explain our situation.
>> But doesn't the blueprint extensions odl:rpc-implementation and
>> odl:rpc-service supposed to register and fetch the service through
>> RPC-registry?
>>
>
> These were recently changed to use the mdsal APIs.
>

 netvirt uses the blueprint RPC ext which have been converted to use the
mdsal APIs so the serialization bypass that Robert mentioned takes effect
and masks the underlying app-side issue. sfc uses the controller
RpcProviderRegistry API whose DOM impls were recently changed to proxy to
the mdsal APIs. However the serialization bypass was "broken" in the
process. I think this explains the difference.


>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Deepthi
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Robert Varga <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2018 3:36 PM
>> To: Faseela K <[email protected]>; Deepthi V V <
>> [email protected]>; Vishal Thapar <[email protected]>
>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
>> [email protected]; Tom Pantelis <[email protected]>;
>> [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [openflowplugin-dev] [mdsal-dev] IncorrectNestingException
>> on SFC when sing OFP model
>>
>> On 09/07/18 11:55, Faseela K wrote:
>> > Netvirt uses blueprint wiring and injects the odlInterfaceRpcService,
>> > where as sfc uses interfaceManagerRpcService =
>> > rpcProviderRegistry.getRpcService(OdlInterfaceRpcService.class);
>> >
>> > Robert indicated that so netvirt is bypassing MD-SAL, as it is taking
>> the service implementation from OSGi Service Registry, and that explains
>> why the failure is happening only for sfc.
>>
>> Correct.
>>
>> Note that netvirt approach requires the service to be local, whereas the
>> SFC approach is location agnostic (the service can be located anywhere in
>> the cluster).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Robert
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
sfc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev

Reply via email to