There's still Stephan's open patch
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/netvirt/+/84369 so it hasn't been
removed from NetVirt yet. Would require a respin of Sodium if we _really_
want to remove it.

Regards,
Thanh

On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 at 01:27, JamO Luhrsen <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think it's time to get SFC out of our managed projects list. It really
> only remained all this time because of netvirt's dependency on it.
>
> However, I don't know if we want to try to do this for Sodium, do we?
> Or is it already decoupled from netvirt?
>
> JamO
>
> On 9/12/19 3:39 PM, Abhijit Kumbhare wrote:
>
> Hi SFC team,
>
> During the TSC meeting today we discussed this issue as well as SFC in
> general. We decided to remove the SFC dependency and SFC tests from the
> NetVirt project. However, I would like to ask a broader question. Given
> that most of you are not full time on the project, do you folks want to
> remove SFC from being a managed project from Sodium? In that case you can
> turn it into a self managed project - and can be included if you desire
> using the lightweight self managed process. Alternatively as a self managed
> project you can also remove it from Sodium altogether. You do not have to
> do the SRs if you are a self managed project, but if support is unlikely to
> happen, then it will be cleaner to not have SFC in the release in the first
> place.
>
> In either case, in case you want to move SFC to self managed, we will need
> to move fast as the release is already due. Please let us know right away.
>
> Thanks,
> Abhijit
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 2:52 AM Faseela K <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello sfc team,
>>
>>    We have this failure in netvirt SFC csit for quite sometime now.
>>
>>           https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETVIRT-1621
>> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=061fbc6c-5a966763-061ffcf7-0cc47ad93e1a-e498b8411736c274&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fjira.opendaylight.org%2Fbrowse%2FNETVIRT-1621>
>>
>>    Can anyone look into this?
>>
>>    If there is no active involvement, please let us know whether we
>> should disable these suites.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Faseela
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:*[email protected]<
>> [email protected]>
>> *Sent:*Wednesday, September 11, 2019 3:05 PM
>> *To:*Faseela K <[email protected]>
>> *Cc:*Jaya Priyadarshini <[email protected]>; Abhishek
>> Nagori <[email protected]>
>> *Subject:*[CSIT] SFC Jira NETVIRT-1621
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Faseela,
>>
>>
>>
>> As discussed we have the below JIRA on SFC that needs to be addressed by
>> SFC team.
>>
>> https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETVIRT-1621
>> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=061fbc6c-5a966763-061ffcf7-0cc47ad93e1a-e498b8411736c274&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fjira.opendaylight.org%2Fbrowse%2FNETVIRT-1621>:
>> SFC:Not able to download and store image in compute from opnfv
>>
>>
>>
>> Please kindly redirect to the concerned team.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Srinivas
>>
>> +91-9243478719
>>
>>
>>
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>
> View/Reply Online (#13699): 
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/message/13699
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34120756/535209
> Group Owner: [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/unsub  
> [[email protected]]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
>
> View/Reply Online (#13705):
> https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/message/13705
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34120756/1869318
> Group Owner: [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/integration-dev/unsub  [
> [email protected]]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#4774): https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/sfc-dev/message/4774
Mute This Topic: https://lists.opendaylight.org/mt/34128663/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/sfc-dev/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to