> One more note: I made one big rpm spec file for all - sfl-common, sfl-client-
> kde and sfl-client-gnome and renamed them:
> - sflphone (main package)
> - sflphone-kde (subpackage)
> - sflphone-gnome (subpackage)

Looks good. However, we need to make sure that the user is able to see
that SFLPhone actually means sflphoned ... the deamon, and should not
expect to get a GUI client with it. I'm all for the
sflphone-gnome/sflphone-kde thing, but I think that "sflphone" might be
confusing and something like "sflphone-server" is a little more
precise.  

_______________________________________________
SFLphone mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.savoirfairelinux.net/mailman/listinfo/sflphone

Reply via email to