> Thanks, > > I agree with you that there should be a public address resolution using stun > on a per account basis. > > We'll take a look at this in a near future. >
nice to hear but more important should be that the STUN-responses make no sense when using a random port. you can use the received IP-Address but you can't use the port. for each stun-req you will get a different port. or maybe i misunderstand stun greetz _______________________________________________ SFLphone mailing list [email protected] http://lists.savoirfairelinux.net/mailman/listinfo/sflphone
