On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 17:39, Barry Revzin <[email protected]> wrote:
> I guess Qt just needs to make sure that its sufficiently uninvokable get() in
> the global namespace doesn't conflict with other libraries that want to do
> the same thing. So you could do:
>
> namespace voldemort::qt::lol { class get_tag { explicit get_tag(int); }; }
> template <typename T> void get(voldemort::qt::lol::get_tag );
>
> That works with Marc's example (gcc 7.1 and clang 6):
> https://godbolt.org/z/NAB3G3 and seems ... rather unlikely ... to conflict
> with anything. You could just provide this unconditionally?
This is not a Qt-specific issue. If it were, you wouldn't have heard
about it. These work-arounds are exactly the opposite
of what we want to do wrt the simplicity that Gaby is talking about,
and a feature-testing macro paves the migration
road to get to that simpler world.
--
SG10 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10
