On Fri, 25 Sep 2020, 21:50 Hans Boehm, <[email protected]> wrote:

> p0943 proposes a C++ header that behaves like the C one, but defines the C
> facilities in terms of std::atomic. So we own our stdatomic.h and WG14 owns
> theirs.
>

Yes, it has to be a C++ version of stdatomic.h anyway, not the C library's
one.



>>
-- 
SG10 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10

Reply via email to