Seems fine to me From: SG10 <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Barry Revzin via SG10 Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:18 AM To: [email protected]; C++ Core Language Working Group <[email protected]> Cc: Barry Revzin <[email protected]>; Cameron DaCamara <[email protected]>; Richard Smith <[email protected]> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [SG10] Missing feature test macros for C++20 core papers
Hey all, Just following up on this since I haven't heard anything. This paper has since been published and can be now be found here: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2493r0.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2021/p2493r0.html__;!!FbZ0ZwI3Qg!_Z9Q4zm9UxAh-rPy9y7k_4UmpvqMou9s7u5MHSMrm1QYj0Ko9Vdg19qm3wiy$> Thanks, Barry On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:38 AM Barry Revzin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hey all, Here is a new paper for the November mailing detailing some missing feature test macros as pointed out by Jonathan Wakely on the SG10 list and implementing Richard Smith's suggestion on how to resolve it: https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2493R0.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/isocpp.org/files/papers/P2493R0.html__;!!FbZ0ZwI3Qg!_Z9Q4zm9UxAh-rPy9y7k_4UmpvqMou9s7u5MHSMrm1QYj0Ko9Vdg14OlJWN6$> One of these changes (for __cpp_constexpr) isn't even a change to the working draft, and is solely a change to SD-FeatureTest (SD-6). Thanks, Barry PS. I'm not sure who the right list of implementers is to CC for each compiler, please forward as appropriate to the right people.
-- SG10 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10
