On Wed, 12 Jan 2022, 22:46 Jens Maurer via SG10, <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/01/2022 21.34, Barry Revzin via SG10 wrote: > > Strong preference for 2. > > Agreed. This is a relatively minor upgrade > to the existing ranges stuff and not really > a fresh, clearly separable feature (such as > a new algorithm). > Another vote for 2 here. > Jens > > > > As I pointed out in the telecon, __cpp_lib_ranges has already been > bumped twice for changes to basic concepts ( > https://isocpp.org/std/standing-documents/sd-6-sg10-feature-test-recommendations#__cpp_lib_ranges > < > https://isocpp.org/std/standing-documents/sd-6-sg10-feature-test-recommendations#__cpp_lib_ranges>) > that were both much larger than this: dropping the default constructor > requirement (P2325) and clarify the O(1) rule and adding owning_view > (P2415). > > > > I don't think we have any other changes in flight for __cpp_lib_ranges > that would conflict with this either. > > > > Barry > > > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 1:36 PM Michał Dominiak via SG10 < > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Hello, SG10! > > > > When P2494 <http://wg21.link/P2494> was being discussed in LEWG, > there were two competing directions for how to handle its feature test > macro: > > > > 1. introduce a new feature test macro that indicates this feature > specifically; and > > 2. bump __cpp_lib_ranges, since other features in flight for ranges > have their own feature test macros. > > > > LEWG requested that I ask this group for a recommendation. > Personally I'm leaning towards option number 1, since it feels cleaner to > me. > > > > Additionally, if this group recommends that I go with (1), I'd like > recommendations for what the name of the macro should be, because none of > the names that I'm coming up with are short enough to be usable, but also > long enough to be descriptive. > > > > Thanks, > > Michał > > -- > > SG10 mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10 < > https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10> > > > > > > -- > SG10 mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10 >
-- SG10 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10
