Aha, thanks -- yes, if the macros are normative, then it might indeed be best if we resolve this four-fold value bump collision with an LWG issue that captures the discussion.
Thomas On Wed, 7 Sept 2022 at 01:35, Jeff Garland via Lib <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sep 6, 2022, at 4:58 PM, Jeff Garland via Lib <[email protected]> > wrote: > > So if we’re not going to treat the addition of the macro as normative > > > Ugh sorry — that should have said — “if we’re going to” — strike the not. > _______________________________________________ > Lib mailing list > [email protected] > Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/lib > Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/lib/2022/09/23604.php >
-- SG10 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10
