Army deploys combat unit in US for possible civil unrest
      By Bill Van Auken
      25 September 2008

      For the first time ever, the US military is deploying an active duty 
regular 
      Army combat unit for full-time use inside the United States to deal with 
      emergencies, including potential civil unrest.

      Beginning on October 1, the First Brigade Combat Team of the Third 
Division 
      will be placed under the command of US Army North, the Army’s component 
of 
      the Pentagon’s Northern Command (NorthCom), which was created in the wake 
of 
      the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks with the stated mission of 
      defending the US “homeland” and aiding federal, state and local 
authorities.

      The unit—known as the “Raiders”—is among the Army’s most “blooded.” It 
has 
      spent nearly three out of the last five years deployed in Iraq, leading 
the 
      assault on Baghdad in 2003 and carrying out house-to-house combat in the 
      suppression of resistance in the city of Ramadi. It was the first brigade 
      combat team to be sent to Iraq three times.

      While active-duty units previously have been used in temporary 
assignments, 
      such as the combat-equipped troops deployed in New Orleans, which was 
      effectively placed under martial law in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, 
this 
      marks the first time that an Army combat unit has been given a dedicated 
      assignment in which US soil constitutes its “battle zone.”

      The Pentagon’s official pronouncements have stressed the role of 
specialized 
      units in a potential response to terrorist attack within the US. Gen. 
George 
      Casey, the Army chief of staff, attended a training exercise last week 
for 
      about 250 members of the unit at Fort Stewart, Georgia. The focus of the 
      exercise, according to the Army’s public affairs office, was how troops 
      “might fly search and rescue missions, extract casualties and 
decontaminate 
      people following a catastrophic nuclear attack in the nation’s heartland.”

      “We are at war with a global extremist network that is not going away,” 
      Casey told the soldiers. “I hope we don’t have to use it, but we need the 
      capability.”

      However, the mission assigned to the nearly 4,000 troops of the First 
      Brigade Combat Team does not consist merely of rescuing victims of 
terrorist 
      attacks. An article that appeared earlier this month in the Army Times 
      (“Brigade homeland tours start Oct. 1”), a publication that is widely 
read 
      within the military, paints a different and far more ominous picture.

      “They may be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control,” 
the 
      paper reports. It quotes the unit’s commander, Col. Robert Cloutier, as 
      saying that the 1st BCT’s soldiers are being trained in the use of “the 
      first ever nonlethal package the Army has fielded.” The weapons, the 
paper 
      reported, are “designed to subdue unruly or dangerous individuals without 
      killing them.” The equipment includes beanbag bullets, shields and batons 
      and equipment for erecting roadblocks.

      It appears that as part of the training for deployment within the US, the 
      soldiers have been ordered to test some of this non-lethal equipment on 
each 
      other.

      “I was the first guy in the brigade to get Tasered,” Cloutier told the 
Army 
      Times. He described the effects of the electroshock weapon as “your worst 
      muscle cramp ever—times 10 throughout your whole body.”

      The colonel’s remark suggests that, in preparation for their “homefront” 
      duties, rank-and-file troops are also being routinely Tasered. The 
      brutalizing effect and intent of such a macabre training exercise is to 
      inure troops against sympathy for the pain and suffering they may be 
called 
      upon to inflict on the civilian population using these same “non-lethal” 
      weapons.

      According to military officials quoted by the Army Times, the deployment 
of 
      regular Army troops in the US begun with the First Brigade Combat Team is 
to 
      become permanent, with different units rotated into the assignment on an 
      annual basis.

      In an online interview with reporters earlier this month, NorthCom 
officers 
      were asked about the implications of the new deployment for the Posse 
      Comitatus Act, the 230-year-old legal statute that bars the use of US 
      military forces for law enforcement purposes within the US itself.

      Col. Lou Volger, NorthCom’s chief of future operations, tried to downplay 
      any enforcement role, but added, “We will integrate with law enforcement 
to 
      understand the situation and make sure we’re aware of any threats.”

      Volger acknowledged the obvious, that the Brigade Combat Team is a 
military 
      force, while attempting to dismiss the likelihood that it would play any 
      military role. It “has forces for security,” he said, “but that’s 
      really—they call them security forces, but that’s really just to 
establish 
      our own footprint and make sure that we can operate and run our own 
bases.”

      Lt. Col. James Shores, another NorthCom officer, chimed in, “Let’s say 
even 
      if there was a scenario that developed into a branch of a civil 
      disturbance—even at that point it would take a presidential directive to 
      even get it close to anything that you’re suggesting.”

      Whatever is required to trigger such an intervention, clearly Col. 
Cloutier 
      and his troops are preparing for it with their hands-on training in the 
use 
      of “non-lethal” means of repression.
      The extreme sensitivity of the military brass on this issue 
notwithstanding, 
      the reality is that the intervention of the military in domestic affairs 
has 
      grown sharply over the last period under conditions in which its 
involvement 
      in two colonial-style wars abroad has given it a far more prominent role 
in 
      American political life.

      The Bush administration has worked to tear down any barriers to the use 
of 
      the military in domestic repression. Thus, in the 2007 Pentagon spending 
      bill it inserted a measure to amend the Posse Comitatus Act to clear the 
way 
      for the domestic deployment of the military in the event of natural 
      disaster, terrorist attack or “other conditions in which the president 
      determines that domestic violence has occurred to the extent that state 
      officials cannot maintain public order.”

      The provision granted the president sweeping new powers to impose martial 
      law by declaring a “public emergency” for virtually any reason, allowing 
him 
      to deploy troops anywhere in the US and to take control of state-based 
      National Guard units without the consent of state governors in order to 
      “suppress public disorder.”

      The provision was subsequently repealed by Congress as part of the 2008 
      military appropriations legislation, but the intent remains. Given the 
      sweeping powers claimed by the White House in the name of the “commander 
in 
      chief” in a global war on terror—powers to suspend habeas corpus, carry 
out 
      wholesale domestic spying and conduct torture—there is no reason to 
believe 
      it would respect legal restrictions against the use of military force at 
      home.

      It is noteworthy that the deployment of US combat troops “as an on-call 
      federal response force for natural or manmade emergencies and 
disasters”—in 
      the words of the Army Times—coincides with the eruption of the greatest 
      economic emergency and financial disaster since the Great Depression of 
the 
      1930s.

      Justified as a response to terrorist threats, the real source of the 
growing 
      preparations for the use of US military force within America’s borders 
lies 
      not in the events of September 11, 2001 or the danger that they will be 
      repeated. Rather, the domestic mobilization of the armed forces is a 
      response by the US ruling establishment to the growing threat to 
political 
      stability.

      Under conditions of deepening economic crisis, the unprecedented social 
      chasm separating the country’s working people from the obscenely wealthy 
      financial elite becomes unsustainable within the existing political 
      framework.

      http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/sep2008/mili-s25.shtml 
      http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/sep2008/mili-s25.shtml

     


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ShadowGovernment" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/ShadowGovernment
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to