The (Near) Death of the State
by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
September 30, 2008

I'm fully aware that Paulson and Bernanke have some nefarious scheme in mind 
to reverse the thrilling defeat of their criminal bailout package, a package 
shot down by independent members of Congress on both sides. But reflect for 
a few minutes on what it means that the House did this. It was a 
revolutionary act in the best sense of that term.

The entire establishment was united in favor of what was surely the most 
horrible and outrageous bill to ever come before Congress. The Fed, the 
Treasury, leadership of the Democrats and Republicans, the Wall Street 
Journal and the New York Times, all the major think tanks, most talking 
heads, the wealthiest corporations, important academics – in short, the 
whole of the power elite – were united in favor of this awful thing that 
proposed the following: Americans were to be stripped of their earnings and 
their future to prop up failed enterprises.

Forget back-door socialism: this was right through the front door. The 
consequences would have been dreadful and very scary. It was to be the first 
of many bailouts, since of course it cannot and would not work. Bad debts 
can't be made good by legislation. This means that more money would be 
necessary, as the middle class was sucked dry by the vampire state for years 
to come. Deeper and deeper economic depression – a repeat of the 30s – was 
certain. Best to put a stop to this now.

The administration might have tried to do its wicked deeds through executive 
order rather than asking Congress. But there are two problems here. One is 
that they wouldn't be able to share the blame when the plan flops. The other 
is economic. The Fed and Treasury are actually very worried that they are 
incapable of injecting more credit into a banking structure averse to 
lending right now. They would rather have the congress authorize the money 
directly and run up the debt.

In any case, no matter how you look at it, the defeat of the bill is a 
victory for freedom. The defeat of the power elite is essential for liberty 
to thrive. For the free market to function, we need the government/corporate 
cabal to lose its capacity to get its way in every area of life. They need 
to feel fear. They need to lose security. They need to have a sense of 
uncertainty as to whether their every wish is our command. The House defeat 
of the bailout is a magnificent rebuke in that sense.

But does it mean that the economy is going to tank and we will all suffer? 
On the contrary, it could mean that we can begin an economic recovery from 
the Fed-generated bubble that should have and would have burst years ago but 
for artificial props by the Fed. If the stock prices of these troubled 
institutions can fall to where they need to be, they can be taken over, and 
their assets used productively and traded by the market. Once this 
deleveraging takes place, we will be ready for a new round of economic 
growth.

You have to understand how ridiculous this whole debate looks to anyone who 
understands the price system. Let's change the example from houses to apples 
to see how silly it is to suggest that falling prices can be made to rise. 
Let's say that the Fed created an apple hysteria that drove the price from 
$3 per pound to $10. Stores loaded up and even used them as collateral for 
expansion. Suddenly the price collapsed to $5 and finally to $2.

Now government takes notice. What can government do to deal with the 
problem? It can try to boost the price of apples by forcing stores to raise 
their prices. But what about consumers? They won't buy at $10. So the apples 
sit and rot. Maybe government should buy them all or force consumers to buy 
them. Also perhaps stores will just not buy any more at all. Government 
could force them to. But it can't force them to stay in business. People can 
always walk away. So perhaps government can just buy the stores, all in the 
interest of keeping the price of apples up. But it will have to buy the 
apple-leveraged stores at a much higher price than the market would offer, 
so this is a bad economic deal on the face of it.

The tangles can get ever more complicated and billions and trillions can be 
spent. You can put everyone in a prison camp and force people at the point 
of a gun to buy and sell apples at $10. But in the end, the problem is still 
the same: the price of apples wants to fall. Nothing government does changes 
that one fact. To attempt to change it is like trying to change gravity. Of 
course, the government’s central bank can raise all prices through inflation 
to the point that apples do in fact cost $10, but this is purely cosmetic. 
In fact, in real terms, the price of apples is still $2. It is a pointless 
and destructive activity to try changing this. You only cause massive damage 
in the attempt.

More great things happened after the bailout failed. Commodity prices 
including oil fell dramatically. This is a magnificent thing. Right now, 
consumers are not threatened by the possible failure of another 
paper-addicted investment-banking house. Consumers are threatened by 
ever-higher prices for all goods. If we are in a recession, especially if it 
lasts and lasts, low prices are precisely what we need to start economic 
recovery again.

It is not entirely clear why prices fall. It could be the worldwide economic 
slowdown. It could be that the markets are beginning to doubt the capacity 
of the Fed to actually achieve the hyperinflation that it wants, since banks 
have become quite risk averse. In any case, we need ever-lower prices on all 
things, including gas and groceries – and, yes, houses. This is the basis 
for economic recovery.

The failure of the bailout bill was the precondition for economic recovery. 
It should make believers in liberty realize that we can change history, that 
tyranny is not our fate, that the leviathan state can be beaten back.

Recently we have urged readers to look to books on money and banking. Now it 
is time to look at books like the Discourse on Voluntary Servitude by 17th 
century French writer Etienne de La Boetie. It was his view that the state 
is the least plausible institution on earth, one that would be overthrown in 
a day but for propaganda and ideological error. He explained all this in his 
book, introduced by Murray Rothbard. We just so happen to have a new edition 
out.

Yesterday was one of the worst days in decades for the power elite. It was 
one of the best for liberty.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rockwell/near-death-of-state.html

__._,_.___

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ShadowGovernment" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/ShadowGovernment
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to