Next Bailout Battle Rages In DC
By fitsnews . on October 29, 2008
http://www.fitsnews.com/2008/10/29/next-bailout-battle-rages-in-dc/

S.C. Gov. Mark Sanford wrangled with some of Washington's most notorious status 
quo spenders today, testifying before the U.S. House Ways & Means committee in 
opposition to another massive federal bailout of our nation's ailing economy.

The contentious session - which was designed to shore up support for a $150 
billion bureaucrat bailout package aimed at rescuing struggling state 
governments - featured Sanford butting heads with New York Democrat Charles 
Rangel, who chairs the committee, as well as New York Gov. David Patterson, 
whose state is facing a $47 billion shortfall over the next four years.

"I'm here to beg of you not to approve or advance the contemplated $150 billion 
stimulus package," Sanford told the committee. "This $150 billion (plan) may in 
fact further infect our economy with unnecessary government influence and 
unintended fiscal consequences."

Sanford - who has made a name for himself by fighting big government at the 
state and federal level - was grilled by Rangel and other Democratic members of 
the committee for his comments, and (surprisingly) passed with flying colors.

It was quite a reversal from Sanford's last appearance on the national stage 
three months ago, in which he earned scorching criticism from us and from other 
political observers after badly stumbling through an interview with CNN's Wolf 
Blitzer.

"We've never before in the history of our republic faced the kind of unfunded 
liabilities that we do now," Sanford told the committee. "I believe that some 
time in the not so distant future we're going to reach a breaking point when 
that $52 trillion will come due, and that our potential inability to pay will 
have frightening ramifications by either completely trashing the value of the 
dollar or creating hyperinflation which robs from every middle class worker 
across America."

Sanford said state governments should deal with their shortages by cutting 
excess accumulated over years of chronic overspending rather than subjecting 
the taxpayers to any additional mortgaging of their future.

"Essentially, you'd be transferring taxpayer dollars out of the frying pan - 
the federal government - and into the fire - the states themselves," Sanford 
said. "I think this stimulus would exacerbate the clearly unsustainable 
spending trends of states, which has gone up roughly 190 percent over the last 
twenty years and 40 percent over the past four years, versus federal government 
spending growth of 175 percent over the last twenty years and 28 percent over 
the last four years."

Sanford has rarely veered off message when it comes to this sort of common 
sense fiscal conservatism, but it's good to see him back on his game.

It's also interesting to speculate whether or not his DC visit will spark 
ongoing rumors that he plans to run for the U.S. Senate at some point after 
stepping down as South Carolina's governor in January of 2011.



#####



video:
http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/index.php?main_page=product_video_info&products_id=282081-1

A hearing was held on economic security and components of an economic recovery 
package. The witnesses discussed budgetary shortfalls, unemployment, and the 
need for infrastructure investment. The witnesses also discussed the ways in 
which unemployment and job loss numbers, rising health care costs, and current 
tax policies have effected working American families during the current 
economic downturn.

Economic Recovery Options


ID: 282081-1
Format: House Committee
Ways and Means
Event Date: 10/29/2008
Length: 5 hours, 41 minutes
Location: Washington, District of Columbia


====

__._,_.___  



 

__,_._,___ 
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ShadowGovernment" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/ShadowGovernment
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to