----- 
From: brian305 
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 
Subject: Capitalism, Class Warfare and the Auto Crisis


The capitalists won't be happy until we're all working for the same 15
to 30 cents per hour that they pay the workers in the countries where
they've "offshored" all of our jobs.

---------------------------------------------------------

Capitalism and the auto crisis
Joe Kishore
20 December 2008
World Socialist Web Site

The US government intervened directly into the crisis of the American
auto industry on Friday, pledging temporary loans to General Motors
and Chrysler in exchange for massive concessions from auto workers and
the destruction of tens of thousands more jobs.

The $17.4 billion in loans announced by the Bush administration amount
essentially to a three-month lifeline, providing the companies time to
impose new concessions on their workers, make plans to become
"viable," or else make preparations for an "orderly" bankruptcy.

In his public announcement Friday morning, Bush made clear that in
providing loans, the government was insisting on certain conditions:
above all, that workers would have to accept a drastic decline in
living standards.

"Automakers must meet conditions that experts agree are necessary for
long-term viability, including putting their retirement plans on a
sustainable footing, persuading bond holders to convert their debt
into capital ... and making their compensation competitive with
foreign automakers who have major operations in the Untied States."

"If a company fails to come up with a viable plan by March 31 [2009],"
Bush declared, "it would be required to repay its federal loans. The
automakers and unions must understand what is at stake and make hard
decisions necessary to reform."

In a separate fact sheet released by the White House, the
administration made the terms and conditions for the funds even more
explicit. These include: one half of payments to the UAW-controlled
retiree health care fund will be in the form of company stock rather
than cash; elimination of the jobs bank, which pays workers partial
wages while laid off; and wages and work rules that "are competitive
with transplant auto manufacturers by 12/31/09."

In exchange for the loan, the government will receive warrants for
non-voting stock, will be able to examine company books, and will be
first in line for any loan repayments. In essence, the government will
be taking a partial ownership stake in GM and Chrysler.

The condition that workers wages and work rules be "competitive" by
the end of 2009 is significant. Though it is formulated as a "target"
and not an absolute requirement, it is a measure that has been
demanded by the section of the Republican Congress that blocked a loan
bill earlier this month.

UAW president Ron Gettelfinger declared, "We appreciate that President
Bush has taken the emergency action needed to help America's auto
companies weather the current financial crisis," Gettelfinger pledged
to "work with the Obama administration" to make the conditions less
onerous.

Workers should have no illusions that the Obama administration will be
any less determined to impose concessions than Bush. President-elect
Barack Obama immediately released a statement on Friday praising
Bush's loan offer. "Today's actions are a necessary step to help avoid
a collapse in our auto industry that would have devastating
consequences for our economy and our workers," he said. "With the
short-term assistance provided by this package, the auto companies
must bring all their stakeholders together -including labor, dealers,
creditors and suppliers-to make the hard choices necessary to achieve
long-term viability."

Obama's statement makes clear that he is in full agreement with the
conditions included as part of the loan package, and that he will work
to enforce these conditions when he becomes president. It will be the
task of the Obama administration to determine whether the conditions
have been met by March 31, or whether the loans should be withdrawn.

As for the UAW, its only disagreement with the plan outlined by Bush
is over the timeline for implementing wage cuts. The union bureaucracy
fears that imposing an immediate wage cut of up to 50 percent would
spark widespread opposition and be defeated by rank-and-file workers
who would have to vote on the measure. Instead, it prefers to help
management remove higher paid veteran workers through buyouts and
early retirement packages first, in order to replace them with
new-hires making $14 an hour in wages.

The developments in the US auto companies have enormous implications
for workers throughout the country and around the world. The 1979-80
Chrysler bailout and the Reagan administration's smashing of the 1981
strike by PATCO air traffic controllers was the beginning of a wave of
union-busting and layoffs. Similarly, the government-backed attack on
auto workers will be a signal for companies across the country to
engage in massive wage-cutting and other attacks on workers.

This attack has already begun. On Thursday, package carrier FedEx
announced 5 percent wage cuts for its salaried workers. Earlier this
month, YRC, one of the largest transportation providers in the world,
reached an agreement with the Teamsters union that includes a 10
percent wage cut.

Hundreds of thousands of jobs have been eliminated in recent weeks and
months, and this is just the beginning. The United States is entering
the greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression. The most
powerful sections of corporate America, backed by the state, are
utilizing this crisis to impose conditions of exploitation and
impoverishment not seen since that era.

To oppose this attack, workers need a new strategy, one that involves
a radical change in the activity, politics, and theory of the workers
movement.

The policy of the UAW and the rest of the trade union bureaucracy has
proven a complete failure, an absolute disaster for the workers the
unions claim to represent. For decades, the UAW has promoted the myth
of worker-management partnership. Workers were told that their
interests were fundamentally identical with those of corporate
management, and that the only way to save their jobs was to ensure the
profitability of the companies for which they worked. On this basis,
the unions pushed through concession after concession, each one
supposedly the last. It also pushed "buy American" nationalist
campaigns, insisting that workers in the US could defend their
interests by opposing auto workers in other companies.

Now, the outcome of this experiment is that workers face the complete
elimination-with the full collaboration of the union itself-of all the
gains won by their parents and grandparents.

As the living conditions of workers have deteriorated, the union
bureaucracy has fully integrated itself into the management structure.
Under the loan conditions announced on Friday, it will be funding a
multi-billion dollar retiree health care fund-which will become a
principal source of the income of the bureaucracy-with company stock.
This will place the union in a position where it directly benefits
from attacks on auto workers.

In order to drive up share value, it must collaborate in the
intensification of the exploitation of its own members.

Workers must build new organizations-independent rank-and-file
factory, workplace and neighborhood committees-that express the
democratic will of the workers themselves. These organizations should
prepare mass strikes and other forms of resistance.

Industrial action must be combined with the building of a mass
political movement of the working class. The intervention of the state
in the auto crisis makes clear that in the struggle to defend their
jobs, workers confront not only the auto companies, but the US
government and both big business parties. With its recent actions,
including the trillions handed out to banks and financial
institutions, the state is ripping away its mask of supposed
neutrality and exposing itself as an instrument of class rule. Just as
it has intervened to push for concessions, the state will intervene to
repress any movement by the working class to oppose these concessions.

What is above all required is a political perspective. The only way
the working class can assert its own class interests is to build a
mass political party, which has as its aim the revolutionary
transformation of society. This is the perspective of the Socialist
Equality Party.

The SEP advocates the transformation of the auto companies and other
major corporations into publicly-owned utilities. Genuine
nationalization does not mean the intervention of the state on behalf
of the financial oligarchy, but the establishment of democratic
control of industry. The state itself, as an instrument of the
corporations, must be replaced by a workers government that can
oversee the rational organization of the world economy to benefit
social need, not private profit.

The necessity for these policies arises organically out of the
objective crisis itself. Capitalism-the so-called "free enterprise"
system-has failed. In response to this crisis, the American working
class must come face-to-face with the basic question of socialism.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/dec2008/pers-d20.shtml 


------------------------------------

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ShadowGovernment" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/ShadowGovernment
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to