Now We Can See Why Open Government Is the Only Way to Go
Wed, 03/18/2009 - 16:06 - dlindorff
http://www.thiscantbehappening.net/?q=node/284



For years, advocates of open government, mostly on the left, but also on the 
right, have railed against the growing secrecy of the US government. But the 
focus, particularly of left critics, has been on the Intelligence budget, a 
$40+ billion "black box" that is completely protected from public and even 
congressional scrutiny, and on large swaths of the Pentagon budget, which 
are kept hidden allegedly for "national security" reasons.

For the most part, the American public has adopted an ovine attitude towards 
such secrecy, assuming that the "government knows best."

Now, however, with the economic crisis, and the collapse of AIG, Citibank, 
Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, General 
Motors, Chrysler and other leading US firms, and with bailouts that are 
putting taxpayers on the hook to the tune of trillions of dollars, the 
people are waking up, or at least are starting to get restless in their 
slumber.

Perhaps there will be a new awareness soon of the importance of transparency 
in all parts of government.

For now, the Obama administration, the Federal Reserve and Congress are all 
trying desperately to ease the citizenry back into a state of torpor by 
adopting a position of mock outrage at the $135 million in bonuses paid out 
by AIG to the very employees who created the disastrous and crooked Credit 
Default Swap market that precipitated the global economic collapse.

What they don't want to happen is for people to start thinking about the 
$183 billion that Congress and the Fed approved for AIG, which we now have 
learned was simply a devious scheme for passing more money in secret through 
to troubled banks and investment banks - among them Citigroup, Bank of 
America, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and others - that had bought these 
CDOs.

Recall that back in September, when the crisis first hit in earnest and 
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson first called for a bailout program, he 
asked-in a three-page proposal to Congress which he insisted they must pass 
or risk total economic collapse and the imposition of martial law!-for 
absolute authority as Treasury Secretary to hand out the $700 billion and 
for protection against any legal action for whatever he might choose to do 
with it.

Congress didn't accede to his imperious request, though it did give him half 
the money he wanted: $350 billion, saying it would provide the second $350 
billion later (the new Congress did hand the second half of the money over 
just before President Obama took office). A sizeable chunk of that huge sum 
of taxpayer money went to AIG, the giant insurance company that had devised 
a scheme to sell "insurance" for the mortgage-backed securities that banks 
were gorging on. The term insurance has to be placed in quotes, because 
since these contracts were not backed by any assets, they were really not 
insurance at all.

As rumors spread that much of the so-called Troubled Assets Relief Program 
(TARP) money that was provided to AIG was actually passed through to banks 
and investment banks that were already receiving TARP funds directly 
(including nearly $50 billion to foreign institutions), Congress and some 
news organizations, notably Bloomberg, sought to learn what firms were 
actually receiving the cash. AIG, the Treasury Department and the Bush and 
later the Obama administration initially fought such disclosure, as did all 
the bank recipients, claiming that releasing the names of the recipients 
would make investors doubt their stability.

Finally, thanks to the efforts of New York State Attorney General Andrew 
Cuomo, whose office has been pursuing the issue in the courts, we have the 
answer: the money was going primarily to the nation's biggest banks.

But most troubling is that a disproportionate amount of the AIG bailout 
money--$13 billion -- went to Goldman Sachs, a company that until July 2006 
was headed by Treasury Secretary Paulson himself. No wonder Paulson, AIG, 
Goldman Sachs and others wanted to keep this all under wraps. No wonder too 
that Paulson initially tried to get Congress to immunize him from the legal 
consequences of his bailout actions.

The truth is that Goldman Sachs and Paulson should be prosecuted for 
corruption. The deal that Paulson engineered in secret for shoveling 
taxpayer money into his former firm is surely one of the largest acts of 
official larceny of public funds in the history of the country.

Goldman Sachs even publicly announced in early February that it was 
returning $10 billion in TARP funds it had received last fall, saying it 
didn't need the money. Well sure the company didn't need the money-because 
it was getting even more in secret via the AIG conduit.

With this backdrop, the rest of the bailout might well be seen as a hugely 
expensive cover: give enough money to the rest of the big banks and 
investment banks, and nobody in the industry will squeal about the sweet 
deal Goldman Sachs was getting.

Of course, the corruption goes much deeper. While public money was being 
funneled into the banks and other financial institutions, those same 
institutions were using some of this taxpayer largesse to lobby Congress to 
do even more. Just between October 1 and the end of 2008, 18 recipients of 
TARP funds reported spending nearly $15 million on lobbying efforts in 
Washington. Among the biggest bailout-recipient/lobbyists: American Express 
($1.1 million), AIG ($1.1 million), B of A ($$880,000), Citigroup ($1.5 
million), Goldman Sachs ($720,000), JPMorgan Chase ($1.1 million), Wells 
Fargo ($580,000). These amounts represent quite an investment considering 
that these firms all received, in return for their TARP lobbying efforts, 
billions of dollars in bailout money.

Remember, Paulson's original plan was to have even the TARP direct bailout 
grants kept secret from the public. That idea didn't fly. But many of these 
companies that used their public funds to lobby for more public funds also 
received secret bonus bailouts via AIG.

So here's what happens when you have secret government. The public gets 
royally shafted.

Now that the story is coming out, the crooks in Congress, the White House 
and at Treasury and the Fed are desperately trying to lull us all back to 
sleep by feigning anger at the relatively paltry sums AIG is handing out in 
bonuses to some of the crooks and scheisters on its staff.

We should not put our heads down on the pillow being offered, though.

The lesson here is that we need open government, and that we need to demand 
that our media not go for the cheap and easy story being handed out by 
government press release.

Also, there's this last thought: If you thought that the banking mess was a 
horrible rip-off, just try to imagine what level of corruption there must be 
in the Pentagon and the Intelligence programs that have been operating in 
absolute secrecy and with no scrutiny for decades!

Baa-a-a-a-a-a-a.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ShadowGovernment" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/ShadowGovernment
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to