http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3_EXqJ8f-0

The real speech re-created by an actor 

If you know your history, you know that in 1934 there was an attempted coup 
in the United States that was thwarted largely due to the efforts of U.S. 
Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler (ret.)

Look it up.

Among other things, Butler was only one of 19 people ever awarded the Medal 
of Honor twice and the only person to be awarded a Marine Corps Brevet Medal 
and a Medal of Honor for two different actions.

After it dawned on him how his heroism and the heroism of the troops under 
his command had been misused, he wrote a book called "War is a Racket" which 
I can virtually guarantee you never heard about in school. 

Butler concluded there are only two reasons to ever take up arms:

1. To defend the country against real - not manufactured - attacks
2. To defend the Bill of Rights


video:
War is a Racket 
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/624.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3_EXqJ8f-0
-- 

===


Chris Hedges | The Disease of Permanent War 
http://www.truthout.org/051909E?n 

"The embrace by any society of permanent war is a parasite that
devours the heart and soul of a nation. Permanent war extinguishes
liberal, democratic movements. It turns culture into nationalist cant.
It degrades and corrupts education and the media, and wrecks the
economy. The liberal, democratic forces, tasked with maintaining an
open society, become impotent. The collapse of liberalism, whether in
imperial Russia, the Austro-Hungarian Empire or Weimar Germany, ushers
in an age of moral nihilism. This moral nihilism comes is many colors
and hues. It rants and thunders in a variety of slogans, languages and
ideologies. It can manifest itself in fascist salutes, communist show
trials or Christian crusades. It is, at its core, all the same. It is
the crude, terrifying tirade of mediocrities who find their identities
and power in the perpetuation of permanent war." 


http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20090518_the_disease_of_permanent_war/


====

Is an Empire necessary?

Bruce Fein
February 10, 2009


An affirmative answer has been assumed without challenge at least since 
World War II. But too much is at stake in American lives and liberties to 
ignore the advice of Bertrand Russell: "In all affairs, it's a healthy thing 
to hang a question mark on the things you have long taken for granted."

Daily news stories speak volumes about the United States conviction that its 
national security interests require a muscular military profile everywhere 
in the planet. The United States is evicted from Manas air base in 
Kryghyzstan in a cat-and-mouse game with Russia. The United States spars 
with Russia over a missile defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic 
to defend Europe from Iran. The United States provides covert assistance to 
Uganda to defeat the Lord's Resistance Army. The United States dispatches 
Middle East envoy George Mitchell to the Gaza Strip to fashion an elusive 
resolution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict and, special envoy Richard 
Holbrooke to Pakistan and Afghanistan to defeat the Taliban and al Qaeda and 
to encourage democratic trappings there. The United States is fighting wars 
in Iraq and Afghanistan in the name of preventing a caliph in Washington, 
D.C.

The United States sports military personnel in a staggering 135 countries, 
and, approximately 1,000 foreign military installations. To borrow from the 
Bible, no sparrow falls that escapes the national security eye of the United 
States.

For more than 60 years, unquestioned orthodoxies have insisted that a global 
empire is necessary to make the United States safer from foreign enemies, to 
make it richer from foreign trade, and to dominate the world (which is 
presumed to be a good thing). But all three propositions are dubious.

Suppose the United States redeployed its military resources that are abroad 
to the United States. Submarines and ships would continue to ply the high 
seas, and military aircraft based in the United States would continue to fly 
intelligence missions. No country would dare attack. Our defenses and 
retaliatory capability would be invincible. Esprit de corps would be at its 
zenith because soldiers would be fighting to protect American lives and 
American soil - not Afghan peasants.

The redeployment would end United States casualties in Iraq, Afghanistan and 
elsewhere. It would end the foreign resentments or enemies created by 
unintended killings of civilians and the insult to pride excited by foreign 
occupation.

President George Washington's Farewell Address celebrated the day when the 
United States would be capable of defending itself with no foreign 
entanglements: "If we remain one people under an efficient government, the 
period is not far off when we may defy material injury from external 
annoyance; when we may take such an attitude as will cause the neutrality we 
may at any time resolve upon to be scrupulously respected; when belligerent 
nations, under the impossibility of making acquisitions upon us, will not 
lightly hazard the giving us provocation." That day has arrived. The United 
States does not need military personnel in 135 foreign countries to deter 
enemies who might threaten our sovereignty.

Neither is the projection of military force abroad necessary to a healthy 
U.S. economy. Trade is fueled by the insatiable passion for money and 
material possessions. It will flourish - either above ground or below 
ground - irrespective of government action.

The United States has expended stupendous sums to curtail international drug 
trafficking without result. No arms embargo ever defeated a belligerent. The 
black market is too clever and nimble. Middlemen will always appear to 
circumvent trade restrictions. In the aftermath of the Yom Kippur War, the 
Arab oil embargo against the United States and the Netherlands failed 
because of resellers. The same resale market foiled the United States wheat 
embargo on the Soviet Union in retaliation for its invasion of Afghanistan.

Further, every commodity has a substitute. During World War II, the United 
States developed synthetic rubber when natural rubber supplies diminished.

Even with the pirates off the coast of Somalia, the United States has not 
thought it economically necessary to dispatch naval vessels to end piracy 
and lower insurance rates. The United States economy has never been 
confronted with ruination because it was denied access to an allegedly 
indispensable commodity.

Finally, the United States was not conceived to dominate the world or to 
intervene for alleged humanitarian objectives by the use or threat of 
military force. According to the Constitution's Preamble, it was formed "to 
secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity." Then 
Secretary of State John Quincy Adams captured the original intent of the 
Founding Fathers in his July 4, 1821, address: "[The United States] has, in 
the lapse of nearly half a century, without a single exception, respected 
the independence of other nations, while asserting and maintaining her own. 
She has abstained from interference in the concerns of others, when the 
conflict has been for principles to which she clings, as to the last vital 
drop that visits the heart. ... She is the well-wisher to the freedom and 
independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own. ... 
She might become the dictatress of the world: she would be no longer the 
ruler of her own spirit."

The American Empire should be abandoned and the republic restored. The 
United States would be safer, freer and wealthier.

Bruce Fein is a constitutional lawyer at Bruce Fein & Associates, Inc., and 
author of "Constitutional Peril: The Life and Death Struggle for our 
Constitution and Democracy."

 
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/10/is-an-empire-necessary/




---





 






__,_._,___
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ShadowGovernment" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/ShadowGovernment
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to