----- Original Message ----- From: muckblit To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 3:26 PM Subject: [cia-drugs] Re: FW: Independent Investigation Into Pentagon Attack Yields Alarming Information
I am watching the video. So far it only looks like they cherry-picked about three witnesses who claimed to see a plane fly north of Columbia Pike and not hit the Pentagon. That contradicts the main body of witnesses which includes a number who saw AA77 hit the wall. Either the second group are lying, or saw a second plane, perhaps the USAF plane having the same airframe as AA77 and which flew above AA77. There was also a following helicopter. Otherwise I don't see anything. They say the engine parts can't be traced to AA77 in particular, but why would they phrase a non sequitur like that while avoiding saying how many parts are identifiable as AA 757 parts, such as several engine parts on the ground? That non sequitur plus avoiding the main body of witnesses smacks of an agenda like Von Haupt and Von Kleist who never met a Jewish witness they liked. The official flight path shows the plane circling the opposite direction from witnesses. Harry Gold, Pentagon contractor who spoke on ch5 Eyewitness News locally, said he was looking out an east facing window when the plane flew up the river. Other witnesses take it from there, as far as the plane flying west up the river and around Rosslyn hill and CIA Langley then coming up Columbia Pike. That vid makes a big deal out of a pilot having credibility when he saw a plane, perhaps the USAF cargo plane, flying over Navy Annex. Where is mention of another pilot who watched out his apartment window and saw AA77 fly into the west wall and the cockpit peel upward, sliced off by the floor slab, and then get pulled into the hole? Only people with an agenda ignore credible witnesses. It is deliberately deceptive to pose cherry picked witnesses and ignore the main body. That's it and that's all; unscientific agenda is evident in cherry-picking with exclusion, and in the blatant parts ID non sequitur. There is also another probable rickety deceptive construct with respect to the light poles, if they all line up perfectly on the hole and for width of AA77 wingspan and then all the witnesses to that flight path are deliberately ignored in favor of cherry picks. Deceptive! Dishonest! -Bob -Bob --- In [email protected], Robert Millegan <ramille...@...> wrote: > ------ Forwarded Message > > From: "dasg...@..." <dasg...@...> > > Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:52:26 EDT > > To: Robert Millegan <ramille...@...> > > Cc: <ema...@...>, <j...@...>, <jim6...@...>, <l...@...> > > Subject: Independent Investigation Into Pentagon Attack Yields Alarming > > Information > > > > > > > Independent Investigation Into Pentagon Attack Yields Alarming > > Information > > > > 8/30/2009 > > > > http://www.news-n-views.com/asp/articlenews.asp?art_id=2560&issue_date=8/30/20 > > 09&place=0659587&edent=2167894 ----- snip ----- ======================== Independent Investigation Into Pentagon Attack Yields Alarming Information 8/30/2009 64 Comments http://www.news-n-views.com/asp/articlenews.asp?art_id=2560&issue_date=8/30/2009&place=0659587&edent=2167894 video: http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/nsa.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o praise http://www.CitizenInvestigationTeam.com/praise.html --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ShadowGovernment" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/shadowgovernment -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
