The IMF to Play Role of Global Central Bank?
      The Dollar Needs to be Devalued by Half?


      By Ellen Brown  |  The Web of Debt 
Global Research, October 5, 2009
      

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15531

      


      "A year ago," said law professor Ross Buckley on Australia's ABC News 
on September 22, "nobody wanted to know the International Monetary Fund. Now 
it's the organiser for the international stimulus package which has been 
sold as a stimulus package for poor countries."



      The IMF may have catapulted to a more exalted status than that. 
According to Jim Rickards, director of market intelligence for scientific 
consulting firm Omnis, the unannounced purpose of the G20 Summit in 
Pittsburgh on September 24 was that "the IMF is being anointed as the global 
central bank." Rickards said in a CNBC interview on September 25 that the 
plan is for the IMF to issue a global reserve currency that can replace the 
dollar.



      "They've issued debt for the first time in history," said Rickards. 
"They're issuing SDRs. The last SDRs came out around 1980 or '81, $30 
billion. Now they're issuing $300 billion. When I say issuing, it's printing 
money; there's nothing behind these SDRs."



      SDRs, or Special Drawing Rights, are a synthetic currency originally 
created by the IMF to replace gold and silver in large international 
transactions. But they have been little used until now. Why does the world 
suddenly need a new global fiat currency and global central bank? Rickards 
says it because of "Triffin's Dilemma," a problem first noted by economist 
Robert Triffin in the 1960s. When the world went off the gold standard, a 
reserve currency had to be provided by some large-currency country to 
service global trade. But leaving its currency out there for international 
purposes meant that the country would have to continually buy more than it 
sold, running large deficits until it eventually went broke. The U.S. has 
fueled the world economy for the last 50 years, but now it is going broke. 
The U.S. can settle its debts and get its own house in order, but that would 
cause world trade to contract. A substitute global reserve currency is 
needed to fuel the global economy while the U.S. solves its debt problems, 
and that new currency is to be the IMF's SDRs.



      That's the solution to Triffin's dilemma, says Rickards, but it leaves 
the U.S. in a vulnerable position. If we face a war or other global 
catastrophe, we no longer have the privilege of printing money. We will have 
to borrow the global reserve currency like everyone else, putting us at the 
mercy of global lenders.



      To avoid that, the Federal Reserve has hinted that it is prepared to 
raise interest rates, even though that would further squeeze the real 
economy. Rickards pointed to an oped piece by Fed governor Kevin Warsh, 
published in The Wall Street Journal on the same day the G20 met. Warsh said 
the Fed would need to raise interest rates if asset prices rose - which 
Rickards interpreted to mean gold, the traditional go-to investment of 
investors fleeing the dollar. "Central banks hate gold because it limits 
their ability to print money," said Rickards. If gold were to suddenly go to 
$1,500 an ounce, it would mean the dollar was collapsing. Warsh was giving 
the market a heads up that the Fed wasn't going to let that happen. The Fed 
would raise interest rates to attract dollars back into the country. As 
Rickards put it, "Warsh is saying, 'We sort of have to trash the dollar, but 
we're going to do it gradually.' . . . Warsh is trying to preempt an 
unstable decline in the dollar. What they want, of course, is a stable, 
steady decline."



      What about the Fed's traditional role of maintaining price stability? 
It's nonsense, said Rickards. "What they do is inflate the dollar to prop up 
the banks." The dollar has to be inflated because there is more debt 
outstanding than money to pay it with. The government currently has 
contingent liabilities of $60 trillion. "There's no feasible combination of 
growth and taxes that can fund that liability," Rickards said. The 
government could fund about half that in the next 14 years, which means the 
dollar needs to be devalued by half.



      The Dollar Needs to be Devalued by Half?



      Reducing the value of the dollar means that our hard-earned dollars 
are going to go only half as far, which is not a good thing for Main Street. 
In fact, the move is designed not to serve us but the banks. The dollar 
needs to be devalued to compensate for a dilemma in the current monetary 
scheme that is even more intractable than Triffin's, one that might be 
called a fraud. There is never enough money to cover the outstanding debt, 
because all money today except coins is created by banks in the form of 
loans, and more money is always owed back to the banks than they advance 
when they create their loans. Banks create the principal but not the 
interest necessary to pay their loans back.



      The Fed, which is owned by a consortium of banks and was set up to 
serve their interests, is tasked with seeing that the banks are paid back; 
and the only way to do that is to inflate the money supply, in order to 
create the dollars to cover the missing interest. But that means diluting 
the value of the dollar, which imposes a stealth tax on the citizenry; and 
the money supply is inflated by making more loans, which adds to the debt 
and interest burden the inflated money supply was supposed to relieve. The 
banking system is basically a pyramid scheme, which can be kept going only 
by continually creating more debt.



      The IMF's $500 Billion Stimulus Package: Designed to Help Developing 
Countries or the Banks?



      And that brings us back to the IMF's stimulus package discussed by 
Professor Buckley. It was billed as helping emerging nations hard hit by the 
global credit crisis, but Buckley doubts that is what is really going on. 
Rather, he says, the $500 billion pledged by the G20 nations is "a stimulus 
package for the rich countries' banks." He notes that stimulus packages are 
usually grants. The money coming from the IMF will be extended in the form 
of loans.

        "These are loans that are made by the G20 countries through the IMF 
to poor countries. They have to be repaid and what they're going to be used 
for is to repay the international banks now. .  . . [T]he money won't really 
touch down in the poor countries. It will go straight through them to repay 
their creditors. . . . But the poor countries will spend the next 30 years 
repaying the IMF."

      Basically, said Professor Buckley, the loans extended by the IMF 
represent an increase in seniority of the debt. That means developing 
nations will be even more firmly locked in debt than they are now.

        "At the moment the debt is owed by poor countries to banks, and if 
the poor countries had to, they could default on that. The bank debt is 
going to be replaced by debt that's owed to the IMF, which for very good 
strategic reasons the poor countries will always service. . . . The rich 
countries have made this $500 billion available to stimulate their own 
banks, and the IMF is a wonderful party to put in between the countries and 
the debtors and the banks."

      Not long ago, the IMF was being called obsolete. Now it is back in 
business with a vengeance; but it's the old unseemly business of serving as 
the collection agency for the international banking industry. As long as 
third world debtors can service their loans by paying the interest on them, 
the banks can count the loans as "assets" on their books, allowing them to 
keep their pyramid scheme going by inflating the global money supply with 
yet more loans. It is all for the greater good of the banks and their 
affiliated multinational corporations; but the $500 billion in funding is 
coming from the taxpayers of the G20 nations, and the foreseeable outcome 
will be that the United States will join the ranks of debtor nations 
subservient to a global empire of central bankers.





      Ellen Brown developed her research skills as an attorney practicing 
civil litigation in Los Angeles. In Web of Debt, her latest book, she turns 
those skills to an analysis of the Federal Reserve and "the money trust." 
She shows how this private cartel has usurped the power to create money from 
the people themselves, and how we the people can get it back. Her earlier 
books focused on the pharmaceutical cartel that gets its power from "the 
money trust." Her eleven books include Forbidden Medicine, Nature's Pharmacy 
(co-authored with Dr. Lynne Walker), and The Key to Ultimate Health 
(co-authored with Dr. Richard Hansen). Her websites are www.webofdebt.com 
and www.ellenbrown.com.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ShadowGovernment" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/shadowgovernment
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to