Subject: Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied






              Once Again, The Will of the Voters Is Denied

              October 9, 2009



              Yesterday afternoon, Justice Edward Lehner of the State Supreme 
Court rubberstamped Referee Louis Crespo’s recommendation that the decision to 
establish a local commission to investigate the events of September 11th not be 
put before the voters on November 3rd.  

              After showing interest in weighing both sides’ arguments in the 
hearing, the Judge’s short decision gives no indication of having considered 
the arguments put forth in the Petitioners’ memorandum of law, nor any 
acknowledgement of the need for a new investigation, which the City of New York 
callously dismissed as “irrelevant”.  

              On a dark day for democracy, the patriotic call for answers by 
hundreds of 9/11 families, first responders and survivors has been stifled, and 
the will of the people of New York City once again denied.   

              Judge Lehner ruled that modifying the petition to make it 
“legally permissible” would result in it being “inconsistent with the law 
sought by the signatories of the Petition” despite the fact that all 80,000 
signatories agreed by signing the Petition that “If any provision of this law 
is held to be unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, the remaining 
provisions shall be in no manner affected thereby but shall remain in full 
force and effect.”  

              The deadline for inclusion on the ballot falls just before the 
election, making it possible to appeal Judge Lehner’s decision. NYC CAN is 
weighing all options and will make an announcement early next week on this 
issue, as well as on how it will be moving forward on other fronts. Regardless 
of the outcome in court, the quest for answers continues full throttle.  This 
fight is only the beginning.       



             Thinkers think and talkers talk.  Patriots ACT.

              www.NYCCAN.org
           




      ---

      "Colorful demonstrations and weekend marches are vital but alone are not 
powerful enough to stop wars. Wars will be stopped only when soldiers refuse to 
fight, when workers refuse to load weapons onto ships and aircraft, when people 
boycott the economic outposts of Empire that are strung across the globe. "
      -- Arundhati Roy, Public Power in the Age of Empire
      http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/56559403

      ---

      "Many people do not have sufficient confidence in themselves, their 
judgment and their capacities to make them capable of disobedience and 
resistance. Having no strong will of their own, they accept that of their 
rulers, and sometimes prefer rulers who will direct their lives and relieve 
them of the task of making decisions. The subjects may be disillusioned, 
exhausted, apathetic, or possessed of inertia, or they may lack a belief system 
which makes it possible both to evaluate when one ought to obey and disobey, 
and also to give confidence in one's right and ability to make such a decision. 
Lack of self-confidence may also be influenced by a belief that the ruling 
group is more qualified to make decisions and to carry them out than are the 
subjects. This attitude may be based on perceived greater competence, social 
customs and class distinctions, or conscious indoctrination."
      -- Gene Sharp, Power and Struggle, Part One of The Politics of Nonviolent 
Action, 1973
      http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/21051113

      ---

      "No free man shall be taken, imprisoned, disseised, outlawed, banished, 
or in any way destroyed, not will we proceed against or prosecute him, except 
by the lawful judgment of his peers and by the law of the land."
      -- Magna Carta, an 800 year old document

      ---


      "It may well be a question, whether these are not, upon the whole, of 
equal importance with any which are to be found in the constitution of this 
State. The establishment of the writ of habeas corpus, the prohibition of ex 
post facto laws, and of TITLES OF NOBILITY, to which we have no corresponding 
provision in our Constitution, are perhaps greater securities to liberty and 
republicanism than any it contains. The creation of crimes after the commission 
of the fact,or, in other words, the subjecting of men to punishment for things 
which, when they were done, were breaches of no law, and the practice of 
arbitrary imprisonments, have been, in all ages, the favorite and most 
formidable instruments of tyranny. The observations of the judicious 
Blackstone,1 in reference to the latter,are well worthy of recital: 





      " 'To bereave a man of life,' says he, 'or by violence to confiscate his 
estate, without accusation or trial, would be so gross and notorious an act of 
despotism, as must at once convey the alarm of tyranny throughout the whole 
nation; but confinement of the person, by secretly hurrying him to jail, where 
his sufferings are unknown or forgotten, is a less public, a less striking, and 
therefore a more dangerous engine of arbitrary government." And as a remedy for 
this fatal evil he is everywhere peculiarly emphatical in his encomiums on the 
habeas corpus act, which in one place he calls "the BULWARK of the British 
Constitution."2 


      --  Alexander Hamilton, Federalist 84


      http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa84.htm

      ---

      ** Members of Congress should be compelled to wear uniforms like NASCAR 
drivers, so we could identify their corporate sponsors.


      Continental Congress 2009 - The Next Step For A Free People [10min ver]
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iiwtfk_uAhQ


      www.CC2009.us



     


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ShadowGovernment" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/shadowgovernment
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to