http://ceasespin.org/ceasespin_blog/ceasespin_blogger_files/fox_news_gets_okay_to_misinform_public.html
 

http://www.relfe.com/media_can_legally_lie.html 
http://www.rense.com/general35/MEDIA.HTM 



Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 11:39 AM 
Subject: UNBELIEVABLE: Court rules it is LEGAL for MEDIA to LIE and DISTORT 
NEWS 


        








Added Comment: And we are wondering why we are going down the drain as a 
civilized society!!! 



Fl Appellate Court Rules 
Media Can Legally Lie 


By Mike Gaddy 
SierraTimes.com 
3-1-3 





On February 14, a Florida Appeals court ruled there is absolutely nothing 
illegal about lying, concealing or distorting information by a major press 
organization . The court reversed the $425,000 jury verdict in favor of 
journalist Jane Akre, who charged she was pressured by Fox Television 
management and lawyers to air what she knew and documented to be false 
information. The ruling basically declares it is technically not against any 
law, rule, or regulation to deliberately lie or distort the news on a 
television broadcast. 





On August 18, 2000, a six-person jury was unanimous in its conclusion that Akre 
was indeed fired for threatening to report the station's pressure to broadcast 
what jurors decided was "a false, distorted, or slanted" story about the 
widespread use of growth hormone in dairy cows. 





The court did not dispute the heart of Akre's claim, 
that Fox pressured her to broadcast a false story 
to protect the broadcaster from having to defend the truth in court, 
as well as suffer the ire of irate advertisers. 





Fox argued from the first, and failed on three separate occasions, in front of 
three different judges, to have the case tossed out on the grounds there is no 
hard, fast, and written rule against deliberate distortion of the news. 





The attorneys for Fox, owned by media baron Rupert Murdock, argued the First 
Amendment gives broadcasters the right to lie or deliberately distort news 
reports on the public airwaves. 





In its six-page written decision, the Court of Appeals held that the Federal 
Communications Commission position against news distortion is only a "policy," 
not a promulgated law, rule, or regulation. 





Fox aired a report after the ruling saying it was "totally vindicated" by the 
verdict. 





© 2003 SierraTimes.com 
http://www.sierratimes.com/03/02/28/arpubmg022803.htm 





-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ShadowGovernment" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/shadowgovernment?hl=en.

Reply via email to