> Would there be any interest in a STN type implementation of Free S/WAN?
>
> Oops... probably not, since that would bring the development of a Free
> S/WAN implentation back into the US, violating one of the primary points
of
> developing Free S/WAN outside of the US.
>
But that does'nt stop STN using Free/SWAN does it ???
Now all we need are 5 Meg floppies for everything everybody wants (printing,
IPSEC, Cacheing Proxy ...)
How about the possibility of a HD version of STN that still has minimal HD
space (around 8 Meg) and RAM (8 Meg) requirements. Are we getting to the
stage of considering that ????
Shaun
_______________________________________________
ShareTheNet maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.webserv.com/mailman/listinfo/sharethenet
