What about enabling the use of these lists by the user, at the user's expense.
I'm sure Netnanny, et al would be more than happy to be supportive of an effort
that would bring them $$$.
Of course, this is putting censorship in the hands of these groups which begs lots
of questions as to what they are really censoring out. Just like the republicans
wanting to censure NPR because there happens to be a high overlap between
NPR supporters and democrats. Watch out for foxes in the chicken coops.
FWIW
On Monday, July 26, 1999 12:29 PM, John Lombardo [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> I've looked into incorporating both Netnanny's list and
> Cyberpatrol's list. They are both prohibitively expensive
> for me to license. It is something I definitely want to do,
> I just have to find a way to get from here to there.
>
> Regards,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >
> > Is there a way to effectively run an http content
> > filter via an STN box?
> >
> > I am trying to block out pornographic websites
> > for an office situation
> > and don't want to (a) have to maintain a list of
> > sites, IP addresses,
> > etc or (b) install and maintain software on the
> > client machines for
> > filtering.
> >
> > Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ShareTheNet maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.webserv.com/mailman/listinfo/sharethenet
>
_______________________________________________
ShareTheNet maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.webserv.com/mailman/listinfo/sharethenet
