Chad Z. Hower aka Kudzu wrote: > Which also brings up... > > Go to the home page. Search for "license". I Cant find anything... rule #1 > of any open source project (Darn, cant use OS abbreviation, would be > ambiguous) is to prominently display the license. > Another thing that I have already discussed, but not fully / formally documented. Check the mailing list archives. The general consensus is an LGPL v2 license with commercial dual-licensing for OEM distribution, branding, etc. I can't remember specifics of it all. But I had a rather thorough debate with William about it at the time. I personally like BSD. But LGPL seemed to be okay enough. GPL is out of the question, unless we shoehorned in our own "linking exception" clause.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ SharpOS-Developers mailing list SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers
