Well i think, just like JaeHyun Roh mentioned, that we should write a simple round-robin/FIFO scheduler first and go from there. If the scheduler is abstracted properly it shouldn't be too hard to experiment with other schedulers.. I wouldn't be suprised if we have to go trough a couple of iterations of 'scheduler interfaces' first tough.
On 9/12/07, Pieter Mees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You have a point there. > > I'll flesh out my idea: > ... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ SharpOS-Developers mailing list SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers
